2002
DOI: 10.3189/172756502781831403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal and interannual variations of firn densification and ice-sheet surface elevation at the Greenland summit

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Seasonal and interannual variations in surface elevation at the Greenland summit are modeled using a new temperature-dependent formulation of firn densification and are compared with elevations from European Remote-sensing Satellite (ERS-1/-2) radar altimetry. The rate constant and activation energy, usually set as constants in the Arrheniustype relation, are strongly temperature-dependent, based on measurements of crystalgrowth rates. A multiplicative factor in the densification rate accounts for di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
198
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
198
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed development of seasonal cycles in density, which increase with depth and which follow the Ca++ seasonality, shows that strong seasonal cycles in impurities can induce a seasonal cycle in firn density unrelated to the temperature. This contradicts the hypothesis that the deep firn seasonal density cycle is induced by temperature at the surface (for example Landais et al, 2006;Zwally and Li, 2002). The relative maximum in density variability in deeper firn (Freitag et al, 2004;Gerland et al, 1999;Hörhold et al, 2011) can likely be attributed to the impurity effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed development of seasonal cycles in density, which increase with depth and which follow the Ca++ seasonality, shows that strong seasonal cycles in impurities can induce a seasonal cycle in firn density unrelated to the temperature. This contradicts the hypothesis that the deep firn seasonal density cycle is induced by temperature at the surface (for example Landais et al, 2006;Zwally and Li, 2002). The relative maximum in density variability in deeper firn (Freitag et al, 2004;Gerland et al, 1999;Hörhold et al, 2011) can likely be attributed to the impurity effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The seasonal temperature cycle is thought to be responsible for the creation of density variability (Alley, 1988;Gow, 1965;Zwally and Li, 2002). Firn models usually predict that seasonal variations in density decrease and fade out slowly with depth in the later stage of densification (Zwally and Li, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2 in Zwally and Li, 2002). Therefore assuming the pole is anchored at the base, their measured velocity should be V fc (z base ) + V ice .…”
Section: Discussion Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore assuming the pole is anchored at the base, their measured velocity should be V fc (z base ) + V ice . For a comparison of the relative magnitudes of V fc (z) and V ice in the steady state, for example, V fc (z = 0) ≈ 2.1V ice at the surface and the total surface velocity is V(z = 0) ≈ 3.1V ice , where V ice = <A>/ρ i and <A> is the mean surface accumulation (Zwally and Li, 2002). Considering the attention given to one measurement from Richter and others (2008), it would be interesting to see similar specific analysis for the other 56 markers and how their chosen accumulation rates for that large range of measured velocities might indicate a stable surface.…”
Section: Discussion Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vihma et al: Spatial and temporal variability in summer snow pack Information on snow density is required to convert satellite observations of changes in the ice sheet elevation to mass changes (McConnell et al, 2000;Zwally and Li, 2002) and to estimate the water equivalent surface mass balance on the basis of stake measurements (Takahashi and Kameda, 2007). Anomalies in snow temperature and accumulation are positively correlated but have an opposing effect on the firn layer thickness (Helsen et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%