This investigation was undertaken between August 2002 and July 2003 at a coastal station on the southern edge of the East China Sea. We found a 2-phase (warm season, > 25°C [June to October] and cold season, < 25°C [November to May]) seasonal cycle with a 10-fold variation in the growth of bacteria (heterotrophic bacteria only) and picophytoplankton, primarily coccoid cyanobacteria (Synechococcus spp.), and nanoflagellate grazing rates upon them. Growth rate in bacteria and Synechococcus spp. appeared to be affected by changes in temperature, and the nanoflagellate grazing rate was controlled by concentrations of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. The seasonal cycles of abundance in bacteria and Synechococcus spp. were a reflection of their changing net growth rates (i.e. picoplankton growth rates -nanoflagellate grazing rates), which were highest at the beginning of the warm season. During the warm season, nanoflagellates consumed an equal amount of bacteria and Synechococcus spp.; therefore, growth in both groups was affected equally by grazing in the warm season. However, during the cold season, bacteria contributed more to nanoflagellate carbon consumed than did Synechococcus spp. because the growth rate of Synechococcus spp. was low. We conclude that during the warm season a significant part of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. carbon is channeled through the microbial loop, possibly making it an important link between primary production and higher trophic levels.
KEY WORDS: Synechococcus spp. · Picoplankton · Nanoflagellate · Microbial loop
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherAquat Microb Ecol 51: [263][264][265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273][274] 2008 nutrient concentration and seawater temperature (Tsai et al. 2005), these observations suggest that bacterial production rates are weakly related to temperature over the summer, but strongly affected by temperature during cold months. Similarly, Ochs et al. (1995) found that bacterial growth rates were unrelated to temperatures above 14°C, which was further confirmed by Shiah & Ducklow (1994). Their findings suggest that temperature might control bacterial growth activity during the colder months. Growth in the warmer seasons seems to be controlled by factors such as substrate supply or availability of nutrients (Keil & Kirchman 1991). Tsai et al. (2005) found a significant diel variation in bacterial growth, but there is a lack of data on the seasonal variation in bacterial growth and of nanoflagellate grazing rates, and on factors controlling the effect of nanoflagellate grazing on bacteria throughout the year. One study (Choi 1994), however, suggested that water temperature and prey density are among the most important factors regulating the seasonal grazing rate on bacteria by protists.Picophytoplankton, predominantly coccoid cyanobacteria (Synechococcus spp.), on the other hand, can make up a major proportion of the phytoplankton biomass and production in oceanic waters (Olson et al. 1990), and...