Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO₂ on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: a free air CO₂ enrichment (FACE) experiment

Abstract

Over time, the stimulative effect of elevated CO2 on the photosynthesis of rice crops is likely to be reduced with increasing duration of CO2 exposure, but the resultant effects on crop productivity remain unclear. To investigate seasonal changes in the effect of elevated CO2 on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) crops, a free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment was conducted at Shizukuishi, Iwate, Japan in 1998–2000. The target CO2 concentration of the FACE plots was 200 µmol mol−1 above that of ambient. Three levels of nitrogen (N) were supplied: low (LN, 4 g N m−2), medium [MN, 8 (1998) and 9 (1999, 2000) g N m−2] and high N (HN, 12 and 15 g N m−2). For MN and HN but not for LN, elevated CO2 increased tiller number at panicle initiation (PI) but this positive response decreased with crop development. As a result, the response of green leaf area index (GLAI) to elevated CO2 greatly varied with development, showing positive responses during vegetative stages and negative responses after PI. Elevated CO2 decreased leaf N concentration over the season, except during early stage of development. For MN crops, total biomass increased with elevated CO2, but the response declined linearly with development, with average increases of 32, 28, 21, 15 and 12% at tillering, PI, anthesis, mid‐ripening and grain maturity, respectively. This decline is likely to be due to decreases in the positive effects of elevated CO2 on canopy photosynthesis because of reductions in both GLAI and leaf N. Up to PI, LN‐crops tended to have a lower response to elevated CO2 than MN‐ and HN‐crops, though by final harvest the total biomass response was similar for all N levels. For MN‐ and HN‐crops, the positive response of grain yield (ca. 15%) to elevated CO2 was slightly greater than the response of final total biomass while for LN‐crops it was less. We conclude that most of the seasonal changes in crop response to elevated CO2 are directly or indirectly associated with N uptake.

Plant Architecture and Flag Leaf Morphology of Rice Crops Exposed to Experimental Warming with Elevated CO2

“…Under elevated [CO2], despite a significant increase in root biomass (data not shown), as has open been reported ( (Kim et al, 2003;Ziska and Bunce, 2007;Yang et al, 2007), the root : shoot ratio was not altered in this study. This suggested that elevated [CO2] is unlikely to change the balance between above-and below-ground developments of rice cultivar used (i.e.…”

“…Early studies reported that although elevated [CO2] increases tiller number of rice crops, this stimulatory effect is only significant up to heading but a relatively minor afterward (Kim et al, 2003). A similar response fashion to elevated [CO2] was also reported for leaf area of rice plants (Kim et al, 2003;Sakai et al, 2006). Such changes in plant height, tiller and leaf area under elevated [CO2] and/or Ta will have the potential to modify in plant architecture at whole-plant or canopy level.…”

“…However, Ta warming universally appears to have a stimulatory effect on plant height of rice plants (Oh-e et al, 2007). Early studies reported that although elevated [CO2] increases tiller number of rice crops, this stimulatory effect is only significant up to heading but a relatively minor afterward (Kim et al, 2003). A similar response fashion to elevated [CO2] was also reported for leaf area of rice plants (Kim et al, 2003;Sakai et al, 2006).…”

“…Dongjin1ho) in this study. However, some other reported that elevated [CO2] increases root : shoot ratio in rice cultivar IR72 (Baysa et al, 2003) and Akitakomachi (Kim et al, 2003), suggesting that there may be a genotypic variation in root : shoot ratio in response to elevated [CO2].…”

“…However, it is well documented that elevated [CO2] had a significant positive effect on tiller number of rice (Kim et al, 1996;Jitla et al, 1997;Yang et al, 2009). In particular, the stimulatory effect of elevated [CO2] on tiller number was pronounced in vegetative growth stage, while the effect became significantly small in reproductive stage due to the fact that a large portion of tiller produced was expired during reproductive stage (Kim et al, 2003). The latter likely supported our result that at full heading stage tiller number showed the lack of response to elevated [CO2].…”