2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal differences in tree species' influence on soil microbial communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A4 in the Supplementary Material) in a cluster is more important for the microbial community structure as reflected in the PLFA amounts and composition than tree diversity per se. This corroborates the assumption of Thoms et al (2010Thoms et al ( , 2013 that their observed trend of increasing PLFA amounts with increasing tree diversity and associated shifts in PLFA composition (especially in early-summer samples) was caused by decreasing beech abundance rather than by increasing tree diversity. However, the results of Thoms et al (2010) also suggest that the observed species-specific effects were partly related to specific edaphic conditions in the plots, which demonstrate the necessity to disentangle the influence of biotic and abiotic environmental factors on the PLFA composition in forest soils.…”
Section: Tree Identity Effects On the Microbial Communitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A4 in the Supplementary Material) in a cluster is more important for the microbial community structure as reflected in the PLFA amounts and composition than tree diversity per se. This corroborates the assumption of Thoms et al (2010Thoms et al ( , 2013 that their observed trend of increasing PLFA amounts with increasing tree diversity and associated shifts in PLFA composition (especially in early-summer samples) was caused by decreasing beech abundance rather than by increasing tree diversity. However, the results of Thoms et al (2010) also suggest that the observed species-specific effects were partly related to specific edaphic conditions in the plots, which demonstrate the necessity to disentangle the influence of biotic and abiotic environmental factors on the PLFA composition in forest soils.…”
Section: Tree Identity Effects On the Microbial Communitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However and in accordance to Thoms and Gleixner (2013), the PLFA 16:1u5 often used as a biomarker for arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi was highly correlated to the abundance of lime trees, even though the roots of this genus show predominantly ectomycorrhizal colonization (Lang et al, 2011). Also in the PCA and RDA, the PLFA 16:1u5 was only weakly correlated with clusters containing arbuscular mycorrhizal tree species (data not shown).…”
Section: Tree Identity Effects On the Microbial Communitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, they interact with their environment, e.g., by moving water and nutrients, on a larger spatial scale compared to bacteria (Coleman and Crossley, 1996; van der Heijden et al, 2008; Trevors, 2010), which might result in a more homogeneous distribution of fungal communities in soil. The life cycle of both bacteria and fungi inhabiting forest soils can be strongly affected by seasons through changes in abiotic and biotic factors (Thoms and Gleixner, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies on the effect of heavy metals on abundance and diversity of AMF have been conducted, we still have a poor understanding of the factors that determine AMF community structure, symbiotic functioning and adaptive evolution (Antunes et al, 2012). Therefore, a better understanding of AMF communities in heavy metal contaminated areas is important to fully evaluate the plant-AMF (K€ onig et al, 2010;Thoms and Gleixner, 2013), AMFeAMF (Jansa et al, 2008) and AMF-soil (Bedini et al, 2010) interactions. The effects of heavy metals on soil environments are complex because of the complex array of parameters (Wang et al, 2010), and therefore it is crucial to identify specific phylotypes or ecotypes of AMF and their relationship with specific soil environments (Zarei et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%