2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal differences of the atmospheric particle size distribution in a metropolitan area in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are also in agreement with the study of Kumar et al (2009) and Fujitani et al (2012), especially given that the short lived nucleation particles are not monitored in this study.…”
Section: Summary Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observations are also in agreement with the study of Kumar et al (2009) and Fujitani et al (2012), especially given that the short lived nucleation particles are not monitored in this study.…”
Section: Summary Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, studies carried out near highways show that number concen-trations of particles decrease exponentially with the increasing downwind distance from the highway (Buonanno et al, 2009;Fujitani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was over a 2-fold decrease in PNC between the first two (L 1 and L 2 ) and second two (L 2 and L 3 ) sampling locations, but this decrease was modest (~30%) between L 4 and L 5 . The sharp decay of PNC close to the source was expected, due to much larger concentration gradients between the emission and background levels, as was also reported by a number of vehicle emission studies (Carpentieri and Kumar, 2011;Fujitani et al, 2012;Pirjola et al, 2006;Zhu et al, 2002).…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Needless to mention that emission sources (e.g. tailpipe of vehicles) are closest to the roadsides and therefore already high PNCs are expected at such locations (Fujitani et al, 2012;Kumar et al, 2008). For the first time the above findings clearly highlight that workers at the refurbishment sites spend long hours and they are exposed to much higher PNCs than those experienced in outdoor ambient or micro-transport environments, indicating a clear need for limiting occupational exposure at such sites.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 78%