2000
DOI: 10.4141/s00-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal distribution of runoff and soil loss under four tillage treatments in the upper St. John River valley New Brunswick, Canada

Abstract: Chow, T. L., Rees, H. W. and Monteith, J. 2000. Seasonal distribution of runoff and soil loss under four tillage treatments in the upper St. John River valley New Brunswick, Canada. Can. J. Soil Sci. 80: 649-660. The effect of four different tillage treatments on surface runoff and soil loss, their seasonal distribution and temporal variation in soil erodibility were examined using runoff-erosion plots (10 m wide × 30 m long), on a Holmesville gravelly loam soil, a major soil type used for potato production in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fallows also had more pores which were involved in the transport process, (Table 3), Note: means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05 Different symbols ( a,b ) shows significant differences, same symbols shows no significant differences resulting in higher hydraulic conductivities. Although there have been reports to the effect that CT can destroy soil structure relative to NT (Ankeny et al 1990;Stonehouse 1991;Nyagumbo 2002 andChow et al 2000), there were no significant differences in hydraulic conductivities between CT and NT. This may be because the duration in which the plots were under the two tillage systems was short for any tillage effects to be shown.…”
Section: Double Ring Infiltration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Fallows also had more pores which were involved in the transport process, (Table 3), Note: means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05 Different symbols ( a,b ) shows significant differences, same symbols shows no significant differences resulting in higher hydraulic conductivities. Although there have been reports to the effect that CT can destroy soil structure relative to NT (Ankeny et al 1990;Stonehouse 1991;Nyagumbo 2002 andChow et al 2000), there were no significant differences in hydraulic conductivities between CT and NT. This may be because the duration in which the plots were under the two tillage systems was short for any tillage effects to be shown.…”
Section: Double Ring Infiltration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is characterized by 30-50 cm of friable topsoil over a dense compact subsoil (bulk density of 1.7-1.8 Mg m -3 ). The plots are described in detail in Chow et al (1990Chow et al ( , 2000. An automated weather station with a Campbell Scientific CR10X 1 data logger (Logan, Utah) and RIMCO heated tipping bucket precipitation gauge (McVan Instruments, Victoria, Australia; sensitivity 0.1 mm) was used to collect data on precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winter ground cover is required in Prince Edward Island as most of the soil loss from potato fields occurs during the cool period of late fall to early spring . However, in New Brunswick, a majority of the annual soil loss is induced by the high-intensity erosivity of summer thunderstorms occurring during the growing season, particularly in June, July and August (Chow et al 1990(Chow et al , 2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deposited sediments were washed into the stream during the spring snowmelt events when the water level was higher. The deposited sediment became soil loss, which was measured during snowmelt period (Chow et al 2000). In addition, the higher proportion of farmland in the BBW was also responsible for the dramatic increase in sediment during the snow melting season (because over 60% of the farmland used for potato production was left bare over winter ) in the ULRW (figure 3b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To examine water runoff or soil loss, cumulative precipitation and erosivity (Wischmeier and Smith 1978;Chow et al 2000), a derived expression of rainfall amount and maximum intensity, are normally calculated along with considerations of land management (Wischmeier and Smith 1978). Velocity of runoff plays a major role in sedimentation mechanisms, which can be more or less affected by the land use and type and amount of vegetative cover (Foster and Carter 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%