2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Dynamics of Fish Assemblages on Breakwaters and Natural Rocky Reefs in a Temperate Estuary: Consistent Assemblage Differences Driven by Sub-Adults

Abstract: Development of infrastructure around cities is rapidly increasing the amount of artificial substrate (termed artificial reef, ‘AR’) in coastal marine habitats. However, effects of ARs on marine communities remain unknown, because it is unclear whether ARs can maintain similar communities to natural reefs. We investigated whether well-established (> 30 years old) breakwaters could consistently approximate fish assemblages on interspersed rocky reefs in a temperate estuary over 6 consecutive seasons using regula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, orientation, slope, and material of the artificial structure are also cited as important agents for homogenization of invertebrate assemblages (Glasby & Connell, ), with the availability of microtopographic refuges being particularly important for sessile organisms (Brandl & Bellwood, ; Freestone & Osman, ). In contrast, compositional differences among mobile fish assemblages appear to be largely due to different macro‐habitats (sheltered vs. exposed [Clynick et al., ; Burt et al., ; ]), light availability (Able et al., ), or ontogenetic shifts in habitat preferences (Fowler & Booth, ). For the cryptobenthic fish assemblages examined in this study, no invasive species were sampled from docks, and the material with which docks were constructed had a limited effect on community composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, orientation, slope, and material of the artificial structure are also cited as important agents for homogenization of invertebrate assemblages (Glasby & Connell, ), with the availability of microtopographic refuges being particularly important for sessile organisms (Brandl & Bellwood, ; Freestone & Osman, ). In contrast, compositional differences among mobile fish assemblages appear to be largely due to different macro‐habitats (sheltered vs. exposed [Clynick et al., ; Burt et al., ; ]), light availability (Able et al., ), or ontogenetic shifts in habitat preferences (Fowler & Booth, ). For the cryptobenthic fish assemblages examined in this study, no invasive species were sampled from docks, and the material with which docks were constructed had a limited effect on community composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, created or restored habitats may not be effective at providing the same suite of services as natural ecosystems (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013 In particular, ecological trade-offs may occur with hybrid coastal protection that incorporates structural elements to facilitate restored habitats (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013). The reviewed restored coastal habitats are commonly evaluated for their effectiveness at maintaining biodiversity ( (Fowler & Booth, 2013). Marsh sills, however, supported epifaunal suspension feeders, such as oysters, which colonized the rock sill and a lower deposit-feeding infaunal biomass than natural marshes (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013).…”
Section: Additional Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are small reef-resident zooplanktivores common to the temperate reefs of southeastern Australia (Glasby & Kingsford 1994, Fowler & Booth 2013 and are one of the most abundant fishes found on this study's artificial reef (NSW Department of Primary Industries 2013, Scott et al 2015). Fiftyfive A. strigatus were sampled from the reef using hook-and-line fishing, frozen on collection, and later dissected with their stomachs stored in 5% formaldehyde.…”
Section: Dietary Analysis Of Atypichthys Strigatusmentioning
confidence: 99%