2007
DOI: 10.1038/nature05638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal dynamics of recurrent epidemics

Abstract: Seasonality is a driving force that has a major effect on the spatio-temporal dynamics of natural systems and their populations. This is especially true for the transmission of common infectious diseases (such as influenza, measles, chickenpox and pertussis), and is of great relevance for host-parasite relationships in general. Here we gain further insights into the nonlinear dynamics of recurrent diseases through the analysis of the classical seasonally forced SIR (susceptible, infectious or recovered) epidem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
238
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
238
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a key advance in the study of infectious disease dynamics, as much of the insight to date on the effects of seasonality on disease dynamics has resulted largely from analytical or numerical analysis of deterministic epidemic (or endemic) models (Bailey, 1975;Bolker and Grenfell, 1993;Dietz, 1976;Moneim, 2007;Stone et al, 2007). While the approach is applied to linearised epidemic models, we demonstrate here that this approach remains robust (and indeed linear in terms of probabilities) even for full non-linear disease systems, particularly when the aim is to gain a better understanding of the invasion dynamics of epidemic infections into vulnerable populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a key advance in the study of infectious disease dynamics, as much of the insight to date on the effects of seasonality on disease dynamics has resulted largely from analytical or numerical analysis of deterministic epidemic (or endemic) models (Bailey, 1975;Bolker and Grenfell, 1993;Dietz, 1976;Moneim, 2007;Stone et al, 2007). While the approach is applied to linearised epidemic models, we demonstrate here that this approach remains robust (and indeed linear in terms of probabilities) even for full non-linear disease systems, particularly when the aim is to gain a better understanding of the invasion dynamics of epidemic infections into vulnerable populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Measles exhibits recurrent epidemics, the frequency and amplitude of which change over long timescales. Much research over the last 40 years has attempted to reveal the biological and dynamical processes that give rise to these changing epidemic patterns, especially the transitions evident in NYC measles dynamics [5,11,[14][15][16][17][18]. In this paper, by more than doubling the length of the NYC measles time series, we substantially enhance the opportunity to test hypotheses concerning the mechanisms that drive childhood disease transmission patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many diseases models incorporating seasonality (London and Yorke 1973;Yorke et al 1979;Uziel and Stone 2012;Aron and Schwartz 1984;Stone et al 2007;Buonomo 2011). In order to investigate the qualitative effects of seasonality, we assume the infection-rate cðtÞ ¼ c 0 ½1 þ c 1 sin ð2ptÞ , where c 0 is the average contact rate-constant, c 1 represents the strength of the seasonal forcing between zero and unity and t has units of years (London and Yorke 1973;Yorke et al 1979;Uziel and Stone 2012;Aron and Schwartz 1984;Stone et al 2007;Buonomo 2011). Note that, for the classical epidemic model with contact rate ruled by mass action law, the sinusoidal forcing may strongly influence the long term behaviour (Buonomo 2011).…”
Section: Seasonally Varying Contact Ratementioning
confidence: 99%