Seasonal effects in the ionosphere-thermosphere response to the precipitation and field-aligned current variations in the cusp region

Abstract

Abstract. The seasonal e ects in the thermosphere and ionosphere responses to the precipitating electron¯ux and ®eld-aligned current variations, of the order of an hour in duration, in the summer and winter cusp regions have been investigated using the global numerical model of the Earth's upper atmosphere. Two variants of the calculations have been performed both for the IMF B y < 0. In the ®rst variant, the model input data for the summer and winter precipitating¯uxes and ®eld-aligned currents have been taken as geomagnetically symmetric and equal to those used earlier in the calculations for the equinoctial conditions. It has been found that both ionospheric and thermospheric disturbances are more intensive in the winter cusp region due to the lower conductivity of the winter polar cap ionosphere and correspondingly larger electric ®eld variations leading to the larger Joule heating e ects in the ion and neutral gas temperature, ion drag e ects in the thermospheric winds and ion drift e ects in the F2-region electron concentration. In the second variant, the calculations have been performed for the events of 28±29 January, 1992 when precipitations were weaker but the magnetospheric convection was stronger than in the ®rst variant. Geomagnetically asymmetric input data for the summer and winter precipitating¯uxes and ®eld-aligned currents have been taken from the patterns derived by combining data obtained from the satellite, radar and ground magnetometer observations for these events. Calculated patterns of the ionospheric convection and thermospheric circulation have been compared with observations and it has been established that calculated patterns of the ionospheric convection for both winter and summer hemispheres are in a good agreement with the observations. Calculated patterns of the thermospheric circulation are in a good agreement with the average circulation for the Southern (summer) Hemisphere obtained from DE-2 data for IMF B y < 0 but for the Northern (winter) Hemisphere there is a disagreement at high latitudes in the afternoon sector of the cusp region. At the same time, the model results for this sector agree with other DE-2 data and with the ground-based FPI data. All ionospheric and thermospheric disturbances in the second variant of the calculations are more intensive in the winter cusp region in comparison with the summer one and this seasonal di erence is larger than in the ®rst variant of the calculations, especially in the electron density and all temperature variations. The means that the seasonal e ects in the cusp region are stronger in the thermospheric and ionospheric responses to the FAC variations than to the precipitation disturbances.

Spatio‐Temporal Evolution of Global Ionospheric Storm Drivers and Hemispherical Asymmetry During 17–18 March 2015 Geomagnetic Storm

“…The thermospheric (O)/(N 2 ) ratio depletion, especially in the Asian sector, is apparent from Figure 8. Joule heating of the upper polar neutral atmosphere from enhanced storm time FACs and increased particle precipitation, cause storm time neutral winds which could transport N 2 molecules from the lower atmosphere to higher altitudes, consequently magnification of recombination rate in the F region and thus the (O)/(N 2 ) ratio decreased, leading to negative ionospheric storm (Anderson et al., 1998; Namgaladze et al., 1998).…”

Euler Potentials for the Earth Magnetic Field With Field‐Aligned Currents

“…Namgaladze et al. (1998) studied seasonal effects in the ionosphere‐thermosphere response to FAC variations. Sizova (2002) analyzed FAC effect on equatorial magnetic field variations in H‐component.…”

Numerical modeling of solar wind influences on the dynamics of the high-latitude upper atmosphere

“…5. These blocks describe specific subsets of the complex system in its own appropriate coordinate system as described in detail in previous model descriptions as, e.g., Namgaladze et al (1996bNamgaladze et al ( , 1998cNamgaladze et al ( , 2000. The magnetospheric block, in particular, has been incorporated into the model in the 90ies (Volkov and Namgaladze, 1996).…”

“…The oval position, including B IMF y -dependent turning and B IMF z -dependent widening or shrinking, has to be harmonized with other model's boundary positions like, e.g., the open-closed boundary (OCB) and the precipitation patterns. The cusp position is of particular importance because of its crucial role in the M-I-T dynamics as observed by CHAMP (e.g., Schlegel et al, 2005;Rentz and Lühr, 2008) and modeled with UAM (Namgaladze et al, 1996b(Namgaladze et al, , 1998c.…”