2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal emanation of radon at Ghuttu, northwest Himalaya: Differentiation of atmospheric temperature and pressure influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to dry soil ambient conditions registered during summer that facilitates the development of a vertical 222 Rn concentration gradient between the soil and the free atmosphere calculated by the 222 Rn flux model. The model reflects the positive correlation between 222 Rn exhalation from the soil and ambient air temperature and a negative correlation with high soil moisture observed in past studies [ Nazaroff and Nero , ; Morawska , ; De Martino and Sabbarese , ; Grossi et al ., ; Kamra , ]. In the GIC3 area there is a significant difference between the calculated high summer 222 Rn fluxes, which have an average value of 140 Bq m −2 h −1 for the reported years, and winter fluxes, which are typically 50% lower (Table ) due to the winter snow layer, present at these altitudes, which can prevent the 222 Rn exhalation form the soil [e.g., López‐Coto et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to dry soil ambient conditions registered during summer that facilitates the development of a vertical 222 Rn concentration gradient between the soil and the free atmosphere calculated by the 222 Rn flux model. The model reflects the positive correlation between 222 Rn exhalation from the soil and ambient air temperature and a negative correlation with high soil moisture observed in past studies [ Nazaroff and Nero , ; Morawska , ; De Martino and Sabbarese , ; Grossi et al ., ; Kamra , ]. In the GIC3 area there is a significant difference between the calculated high summer 222 Rn fluxes, which have an average value of 140 Bq m −2 h −1 for the reported years, and winter fluxes, which are typically 50% lower (Table ) due to the winter snow layer, present at these altitudes, which can prevent the 222 Rn exhalation form the soil [e.g., López‐Coto et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (ICRP) International Commission on Radiological Protection has therefore reviewed the higher value for the reference level for radon gas in dwellings from the level in the 2007 Recommendations of (600 Bq/m 3 ) to (300 Bq/m 3 ). The dissolved in soft tissues and dose rate due to alpharadiation in the lung formed from the radon gas inhalation samples is listed in Table (6 and 7) and calculated using equation (7). The average dissolved in soft tissues range from 0.0248 to 0.51 (nGyh -1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that drinking water which contains radon is far less harmful than breathing the gas. The health risk does not come from consuming the radon, but from inhaling the gas [7].…”
Section: Ways For Entering the Radon To Dwellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal variations in 222 Rn activities in groundwater at the decadal timescale are associated with tectonic and cosmic drivers (Finkelstein et al 1998 ; Yan et al 2017 ). These overlay daily and seasonal cycles driven by environmental factors such as groundwater recharge-discharge cycles or temperature gradients (Choubey et al 2011 ; Kamra 2015 ). These complex dynamics in the aquatic environment result in variable 222 Rn activities in continental water resources, and hence human exposure to water-borne radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%