Context. On 27 April 2015, when 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was at 1.76 au from the Sun and moving towards perihelion, the OSIRIS and VIRTIS-M instruments on board Rosetta simultaneously observed the evolving dust and gas coma during a complete rotation of the comet. Aims. We aim to characterize the dust, H 2 O and CO 2 gas spatial distribution in the inner coma. To do this we performed a quantitative analysis of the release of dust and gas and compared the observed H 2 O production rate with the one calculated using a thermo-physical model. Methods. For this study we selected OSIRIS WAC images at 612 nm (dust) and VIRTIS-M image cubes at 612 nm, 2700 nm (H 2 O emission band) and 4200 nm (CO 2 emission band). We measured the average signal in a circular annulus, to study spatial variation around the comet, and in a sector of the annulus, to study temporal variation in the sunward direction with comet rotation, both at a fixed distance of 3.1 km from the comet centre.Results. The spatial correlation between dust and water, both coming from the sun-lit side of the comet, shows that water is the main driver of dust activity in this time period. The spatial distribution of CO 2 is not correlated with water and dust. There is no strong temporal correlation between the dust brightness and water production rate as the comet rotates. The dust brightness shows a peak at 0 • sub-solar longitude, which is not pronounced in the water production. At the same epoch, there is also a maximum in CO 2 production. An excess of measured water production, with respect to the value calculated using a simple thermo-physical model, is observed when the head lobe and regions of the Southern hemisphere with strong seasonal variations are illuminated (sub-solar longitude 270 • -50 • ). A drastic decrease in dust production, when the water production (both measured and from the model) displays a maximum, happens when typical Northern consolidated regions are illuminated and the Southern hemisphere regions with strong seasonal variations are instead in shadow (sub-solar longitude 50 • -90 • ). Possible explanations of these observations are presented and discussed.