2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal occurrence of Theileria parva infection and management practices amongst Maasai pastoralist communities in Monduli District, Northern Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling strategy and findings have been described in detail elsewhere (Kimaro et al 2017a(Kimaro et al , 2017b. Briefly, in order to meet the objectives and sample size requirements for the study, a questionnaire was administered to 130 pastoralists across the 10 randomly selected villages between March and May 2015.…”
Section: Cattle Owners' Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sampling strategy and findings have been described in detail elsewhere (Kimaro et al 2017a(Kimaro et al , 2017b. Briefly, in order to meet the objectives and sample size requirements for the study, a questionnaire was administered to 130 pastoralists across the 10 randomly selected villages between March and May 2015.…”
Section: Cattle Owners' Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study calls for improvements to adaptive capacity of pastoralist communities, including effective and sustainable animal health services. These services must include animal disease surveillance, coupled with sustainable cattle disease management programs in pastoral communities (Kimaro et al 2017a). …”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change On Cattle Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the difference in T. parva prevalence between the two studies is likely due to different tick control regimes in the different areas. The prevalence of T. parva established in cattle in this study was higher than a 31.6% prevalence found byKimaro, Mor, Gwakisa and Toribio (2017) which was done in Monduli district in the Maasai steppe ecosystem during the dry season. These differences in prevalence may be explained by the ecological and other associated conditions which may favor ticks in different areas where cattle were sampled.…”
contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…These differences in prevalence may be explained by the ecological and other associated conditions which may favor ticks in different areas where cattle were sampled. The study done byKimaro et al (2017) sampled cattle during the dry season which is characterized with low tick intensity compared to the wet season during which the present study was conducted. The prevalence values reported in these studies point to a high possibility that most of the animals sampled were in a T. parva carrier state, which is a common phenomenon following natural infection or ITM in cattle…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…positive than older cattle [17]; however, the cutoff age is different. However, these findings differ from those of other studies [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%