1997
DOI: 10.1029/97wr00490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations: Separating catchment flow path and in‐stream effects

Abstract: 2) and minima (<0.6) in spring and autumn, suggesting substantial in-stream net uptake at these times. Observed/predicted DOC concentration ratios were more variable and generally ->1 but did show consistent autumn maxima (>2.5), indicating substantial in-stream DOC generation at this time. Observed/ predicted ratios for all nutrients were generally less variable and were closer to 1.0 at high flow compared to low flow, suggesting that in-stream controls on streamwater chemistry are less important at high disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
232
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(57 reference statements)
14
232
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes were especially evident within the high damage zone (600-740 m elevation), and apparent to a lesser extent at lower elevations where the canopy damage was less severe. Seasonal variation in light penetration and organic matter input can strongly influence patterns of nutrient uptake in streams (12,26,27). Thus, large-scale canopy damage should be expected to lead to even more dramatic changes in stream nutrient cycling, because of prolonged impacts on light penetration and organic matter availability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes were especially evident within the high damage zone (600-740 m elevation), and apparent to a lesser extent at lower elevations where the canopy damage was less severe. Seasonal variation in light penetration and organic matter input can strongly influence patterns of nutrient uptake in streams (12,26,27). Thus, large-scale canopy damage should be expected to lead to even more dramatic changes in stream nutrient cycling, because of prolonged impacts on light penetration and organic matter availability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that dissolved nutrients are removed primarily by sorption onto bottom sediments or active uptake by microbial communities attached to bottom substrata (19)(20)(21). Although the ammonium uptake per unit of area did not differ between forested and deforested reaches, the amount taken up per unit of channel length was significantly greater (often by 2-to 10-fold) in the forested reaches of most streams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Besides a qualitative description of the infiltration process, the concentration of the conservative tracers (Br − and Cl − ) was used to calculate the proportion of different water sources (event vs. pre-event water) using a two-component end-member mixing (EMMA) model. The EMMA model has been widely used for hydrological studies to separate the different contributions of streamflow (Christophersen and Hooper, 1992;Mulholland and Hill, 1997;Soulsby et al, 2003;James and Roulet, 2006;Cras et al, 2007). The end members are usually defined from the reservoir characteristics; therefore mixing diagrams inform about the variable source areas of runoff.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%