1984
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841201)54:11<2587::aid-cncr2820541147>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal patterns in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma of skin and eye in upstate New York

Abstract: Seasonal patterns in diagnosis were examined for 2403 melanomas of the skin and 238 melanomas of the eye diagnosed among residents of upsatate New York State in 1975 to 1979 and reported to the population‐based New York State Cancer Registry. The previously reported summer peak in diagnosis of melanoma of the lower extremity in females was confirmed and shown to hold for melanomas diagnosed at both early and late clinical stages; increased recognition of earlier stage melanomas in summer months is an unlikely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we found no difference according to age and sex, previous reports suggested that seasonality was more pronounced among females [5,18,29,33] and people over 55 years of age [5,6,12]. Psycho-social and hormonal factors, as well as different patterns of sun exposure, were proposed as possible explanations [7,9]. Our observation that tumours diagnosed in June are more likely to be of the superficial spreading subtype corroborates previous findings [5,6,30], although the explanation for this subtype specificity is currently unknown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we found no difference according to age and sex, previous reports suggested that seasonality was more pronounced among females [5,18,29,33] and people over 55 years of age [5,6,12]. Psycho-social and hormonal factors, as well as different patterns of sun exposure, were proposed as possible explanations [7,9]. Our observation that tumours diagnosed in June are more likely to be of the superficial spreading subtype corroborates previous findings [5,6,30], although the explanation for this subtype specificity is currently unknown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Seasonal variation in cutaneous melanoma incidence is a welldocumented phenomenon, with several studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] showing an incidence peak in summer. Some hypotheses have been proposed: such as the effect of prevention campaigns [14], seasonal variation in clothing habits [15,16], seasonal change in medical care, or a short-term effect of ultraviolet radiation exposure [11,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this seasonality of melanoma diagnosis have been controversial in the past, focusing mostly on the following explanations: several groups supported the role of UV radiation, which may have a short-term proliferative effect leading to the development of cutaneous melanomas diagnosed during summertime. 1,4 Our data do not support this explanation because in Germany, the main period of sun exposure is between July and August, and the peak of melanoma diagnosis was in June. However, a long-term effect of UV radiation can not be excluded completely.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] A direct influence of the increased UV radiation on melanoma development in summer was discussed as a possible reason for this diagnostic peak in summertime, 1,2,4 as was a change in clothing habits during the summer months, 5,6 resulting in an increased melanoma detection rate. However, there are few studies reporting on different seasonal peaks for subgroups of patients with melanoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several epidemiologic studies have revealed remarkable seasonal peaks of melanoma diagnosis in spring and summer (1–3). This has also been the case in other forms of cancer (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%