2017
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal specialization in diet of the Humboldt marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis) in California and the importance of prey size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant consumption of voles was consistent with North American marten diet studies [33,45,46] but we detected substantially lower frequency of occurrence of squirrel species [45,47] and shrews [48]. Humboldt marten diet in northern California has been shown to heavily rely on chipmunks [49] which contrasts our study, where chipmunks were only detected in 2% of the marten scats despite being highly abundant in the coastal forests (Fig 2). Frequency of birds in the diet (53.3%) was much higher than the 10–20% typically described in North American martens’ diet [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dominant consumption of voles was consistent with North American marten diet studies [33,45,46] but we detected substantially lower frequency of occurrence of squirrel species [45,47] and shrews [48]. Humboldt marten diet in northern California has been shown to heavily rely on chipmunks [49] which contrasts our study, where chipmunks were only detected in 2% of the marten scats despite being highly abundant in the coastal forests (Fig 2). Frequency of birds in the diet (53.3%) was much higher than the 10–20% typically described in North American martens’ diet [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We used a Bayesian occupancy model and data from sites to examine relationships between covariates of interest and estimate occupancy and detection probability (MacKenzie et al ; Table ). We only used marten detection–nondetection data at baited camera stations within a site to model, but included data from both baited and trail stations for our predator presence covariate because it was hypothesized that presence of predators could negatively affect marten occurrence (Slauson et al ). Martens are highly mobile and regularly move up to 6 km/day (Moriarty et al ), so we used a 1‐day visit replicate and assumed that a marten could encounter a survey device in this period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the factors influencing the diet of invasive predators is integral for conserving sensitive prey species. Predation patterns can be influenced by prey abundance (Floeter & Temming, ; Jaworski et al ., ), accessibility (Kelly, ; Grant et al ., ), defense mechanisms (Foltan, ; Murphy et al ., ; Clements, Tambling & Kerley, ; Tallian et al ., ), season (Zielinski et al ., ; Bonnaud et al ., ; Thinley et al ., ; Slauson & Zielinski, ), and weather (Konecny, ; Szép, Bocz & Purger, ). By assessing how these factors influence predation, managers can predict what species may be most sensitive to invasive predators, identify times where species of concern are particularly disposed to predation, and develop management strategies to mitigate threats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%