2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1192-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation in ambient PM mass and number concentrations (case study: Tehran, Iran)

Abstract: Tehran, the capital city of Iran, is an important industrial and commercial center. This city is one of the worst cities in the world in terms of air pollution, which is mostly due to mobile sources rather than stationary sources. Particulate matter (PM), which is a complex mixture of extremely small particles and liquid droplets, is considered as an important source of air pollution in Tehran. In this study, our objective was to study PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1.0) mass and number concentrations and find the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Farah Halek et al (2010) reported PM 2.5 concentrations at four stations in the northwest of Tehran and found higher accumulation of particles during warmer seasons compared to cold seasons and the total mean PM 2.5 concentration was reported as 210.5 µg.m -3 while it was 100 µg.m -3 in the present study. This difference could be due to lower sample size and different study areas that some of them may not be representative of the whole city (22). AditiKulshresta et al (2009) studied seasonal variations of particle concentration in Agra, India, and reported 104.9 µg.m -3 PM 2.5 concentrations in urban areas, which was equal to the mean concentration of the pollutant in the present study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Farah Halek et al (2010) reported PM 2.5 concentrations at four stations in the northwest of Tehran and found higher accumulation of particles during warmer seasons compared to cold seasons and the total mean PM 2.5 concentration was reported as 210.5 µg.m -3 while it was 100 µg.m -3 in the present study. This difference could be due to lower sample size and different study areas that some of them may not be representative of the whole city (22). AditiKulshresta et al (2009) studied seasonal variations of particle concentration in Agra, India, and reported 104.9 µg.m -3 PM 2.5 concentrations in urban areas, which was equal to the mean concentration of the pollutant in the present study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Its inhabitants are generally exposed to high levels of urban background PM due to the large number of anthropogenic sources and the unique geographic characteristics of a city surrounded by a high altitude mountain chain on its boundary, downstream of the prevailing wind Halek et al, 2010;Sabetghadam et al, 2012) Previous researches have indicated suspended particles to be one of the causes of the most serious air pollution problems in Tehran (Nabi Bidhendi and Halek, 2007). Limited measurements of particulate matter with respect to its chemical composition are available from Tehran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature inversion is another factor contributing to air pollution, particularly in cold seasons [60]. During these seasons, PM as the major air pollutant of Tehran's air is increased [61]. The annual average of PM 10 [54].…”
Section: Iranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has shown that, in cold seasons, the PM 10 mass concentration increased almost 2 folds and PM 2.5 and PM 1.0 nearly 3 times. The mean number concentration of these particles was found to be almost 4.8 times in the same season [61]. This could be attributed to the Tehran's geographical position being edged by mountains from the north, and to the fact that the wind is cold and slow, which makes air pollutants become trapped over Tehran [61][62][63].…”
Section: Iranmentioning
confidence: 99%