Seasonal Variation in Diagnoses and Visits to Family Physicians

Abstract

BACKGROUND Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) replicating the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) must sample more than 1 year to account for presumed seasonal variation in illnesses. This study evaluated the effects of seasonality on diagnoses within NAMCS family physician data.METHODS Using combined data from the 1995-1998 NAMCS, diagnostic clusters that accounted for more than 1% of total visits were analyzed for seasonality. Seasons were coded categorically as dummy variables with summer as the reference category. A logistic regression was performed with each diagnosis as an outcome on the full data. To examine the ability of alternative sampling strategies to replicate the full year of data, a simulation study was carried out drawing 50 samples of 1,000 visits each for winter-summer and spring-fall sampling periods. RESULTSWe found 23 diagnostic clusters that had a frequency more than 1%, of which 10 had seasonal variations (P ≤.001), primarily between winter and summer. If sampling were restricted to spring, the diagnostic clusters of pregnancy and coronary artery disease would account for less than 1% of visits. All other diagnostic clusters, though changing rank order, would account for more than 1% if sampled in a single quarter. In the simulated sampling strategy, visit prevalence dropped below 1% for at least 1 diagnosis in 24 of 50 samples in spring-fall compared with 20 of 50 samples for winter-summer (P >.20).CONCLUSIONS There is little seasonal variation in the 23 diagnoses that occur in more than 1% of visits to family physicians. There is, however, important seasonal variation in the rank order of these diagnoses. A sampling strategy that uses any quarter of the year but spring (March, April, May) could be used to understand what diagnoses are frequently seen within a PBRN.

Measuring Comprehensiveness of Primary Care: Challenges and Opportunities

“…41,45,46,[66][67][68][69][70] Several potential claims-based approaches may be useful for estimating a practice's comprehensiveness.…”

“…41,45,69 Diagnostic clusters group individual diagnostic codes to bring together conditions with similar pathophysiologic characteristics that tend to be treated in similar ways. They simplify the ICD system to manageable proportions and compensate for idiosyncratic labeling and coding by individual physicians.…”

Describing Primary Care Encounters: The Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

“…Visit diagnoses were also examined using ICD-9-CM clusters as described by Pace et al 23 For this analysis, we considered all diagnoses listed for the encounter. Because multiple diagnoses per patient encounter were coded within the NAMCS and PRINS databases (maximum of 3 diagnoses for NAMCS and 6 for PRINS), diagnoses were weighted so as to refl ect the weighted number of encounters.…”

Pharmacy Clarification of Prescriptions Ordered in Primary Care: A Report from the Applied Strategies for Improving Patient Safety (ASIPS) Collaborative

“…Call rates may have also varied based on the time of month when data collection occurred (ie, beginning of the month versus end of the month), although previous work on diagnostic information indicates this time spread should adequately reflect seasonal variation in presenting problems. 15 Third, the callback logs did not indicate type of prescribing clinician (eg, physician, physician assistant, resident) and it cannot be determined more precisely if certain clinicians were more likely to generate calls, especially residents. Fourth, although written instructions were sent and verbal instructions were given to on-site coordinators about the study protocol and definitions used on the forms, verification or monitoring did not occur to determine whether these logs represent all or nearly all the calls received from pharmacies.…”