2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2021.104613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation of sea surface pH and its controls in the Jiaozhou Bay, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where DDIC p-d , DDIC bio , and DDIC a-s represent DIC changes caused by CaCO 3 precipitation-dissolution, biological, and sea-air exchange processes, respectively; DAlk p-d and DAlk bio represent Alk changes caused by the processes of CaCO 3 precipitationdissolution and biological processes, respectively; and −17/106 × DDIC bio is the expected Alk change during the biological use or release of DIC assuming the Redfield ratio (Redfield et al, 1963). Considering that the change in Alk from biological processes is relatively minor compared to changes in DIC, the biological term was ignored in practice according to previous studies (Xue et al, 2016;Li et al, 2022;Zhang and Hu, 2023).…”
Section: Calculations For Separating Dic Controlling Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where DDIC p-d , DDIC bio , and DDIC a-s represent DIC changes caused by CaCO 3 precipitation-dissolution, biological, and sea-air exchange processes, respectively; DAlk p-d and DAlk bio represent Alk changes caused by the processes of CaCO 3 precipitationdissolution and biological processes, respectively; and −17/106 × DDIC bio is the expected Alk change during the biological use or release of DIC assuming the Redfield ratio (Redfield et al, 1963). Considering that the change in Alk from biological processes is relatively minor compared to changes in DIC, the biological term was ignored in practice according to previous studies (Xue et al, 2016;Li et al, 2022;Zhang and Hu, 2023).…”
Section: Calculations For Separating Dic Controlling Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIC and δ 13 C DIC samples were filtered to 20 mL high borosilicate glass bottles with 0.45 µm disposable syringe filters and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) samples were filtered through 0.7 µm GF/F glass fiber membrane (Whatman Corporation, Maidstone, UK) into 100 mL vials, and then these samples were stored at 4 • C until laboratory analysis after addition of saturated mercuric chloride solution (final concentration: ~0.04% by volume). The concentrations of DIC and DOC were measured by using a total organic carbon analyzer (Multi N/C 3100, Analytik Jena Corporation, Jena, Germany) with an uncertainty of ~0.06 mg L −1 [37]. The δ 13 C DIC values were measured using a Gasbench II Extraction Line coupled with a Finnigan MAT 253 Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Massachusetts, USA), with a standard deviation of 0.05‰ (n = 4).…”
Section: Station Setting and Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above instrument analysis work was completed within three weeks after sampling. Also, in situ pH, partial pressure of CO 2 (pCO 2 ) and [HCO 3 − ] were calculated from DIC, pH @25 • C and Tw based on the CO2SYS program (Version 2.3) [38] which was a calculator for the CO 2 system for Microsoft Excel 2016 and was used in many studies [35][36][37]39]. The dissociation constants (K 1 and K 2 ) of carbonic acid determined by Millero.…”
Section: Station Setting and Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%