2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-017-0242-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Variations in Drag Coefficient over a Sastrugi-Covered Snowfield in Coastal East Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern visible in Fig. 7 is common for blowing snow over Antarctica: a seasonal cycle peaking during the Antarctic winter (March-November) and displaying lower values for the rest of the year (Mahesh et al, 2003;Lenaerts et al, 2010;Scarchili et al, 2010;Palm et al, 2011;Amory et al, 2017). The overall blowing snow frequency is computed at PE for the 2010-2016 period and reaches 13 %.…”
Section: Frequency Of Blowing Snowmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pattern visible in Fig. 7 is common for blowing snow over Antarctica: a seasonal cycle peaking during the Antarctic winter (March-November) and displaying lower values for the rest of the year (Mahesh et al, 2003;Lenaerts et al, 2010;Scarchili et al, 2010;Palm et al, 2011;Amory et al, 2017). The overall blowing snow frequency is computed at PE for the 2010-2016 period and reaches 13 %.…”
Section: Frequency Of Blowing Snowmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The mean time lag since the last precipitation event at PE (23 h) indicates that these events most likely occur shortly after a storm and that cloudless blowing snow (8 %) is mostly associated with katabatic winds. Apart from these factors, sastrugi might also have an impact on blowing snow (Amory et al, 2017) but are not measured here.…”
Section: Blowing Snow and Meteorological Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low value was tuned in the CMIP3 version to compensate for a deficit of longwave downward radiation at surface. The roughness lengths for momentum z 0 and for heat z0t are set to 103 and 104 m, respectively. These values are close to measurements at Dome C (Vignon et al, ) and in reasonable agreement with measurements over other regions of the Antarctic Plateau (Amory et al, ). The snow thermal inertia is set to 350 J normalm2 normalK1 normals1/2 instead of the original largely overestimated value of 2,000 J normalm2 normalK1 normals1/2.…”
Section: Climatological Settings Data and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrapolation to observation levels are also plotted (dotted line, see legend for details). Further information on measurements at D17, D47, and D85 stations can be found in Wendler et al (), Barral et al (), and Amory et al () (see also the webpage http://amrc.ssec.wisc.edu/aws/index.php?region=Adelie\%20Coast&year=2017&mode=uw). Note that while landscapes at Dome C, D47, and D85 are relatively homogeneous—suggesting a representativity of the local measurement at the LMDZ grid scale ( 110 km × 140 km)—the topographic and geographic spatial variability near D17 at the 10 km scale makes the simulation‐observation comparison delicate at this site.…”
Section: Climate Simulations With the Free Lmdz Model: Impact Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jackson and Carroll (1978) and Inoue (1989) observed that the greatest surface roughnesses in Antarctica occur over sastrugi fields. Amory et al (2016Amory et al ( , 2017 observed sastrugi as they adjust to changing wind direction and measured the seasonal correlation between wind drag and sastrugi size. Andreas and Claffey (1995) observed atmospheric drag change by 30% in 12 hr in response to snow redistribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%