2013
DOI: 10.3189/2013jog12j238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variations of outlet glacier terminus position in Greenland

Abstract: Many of Greenland’s marine-terminating outlet glaciers have undergone rapid retreat in the past decade, accompanied by accelerated flow and dynamic thinning. Superimposed on this pattern of retreat, these glaciers undergo seasonal variations in terminus position, corresponding roughly to wintertime advance and summertime retreat. We compiled near-daily time series of terminus position for five of Greenland’s largest outlet glaciers (Daugaard Jensen, Kangerdlugssuaq and Helheim glaciers in East Greenland, and J… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(121 reference statements)
5
105
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At Store Glacier, frontal mass loss during both summers is greater on the southern flank, where a large embayment between two headlands coincides with an upwelling plume visible at the surface. These observations suggest that in addition to the fjord geometrical control on the glacier calving processes (McFadden et al, 2011;Schild and Hamilton, 2013), the presence of warm, subpolar-originating water bodies at the glacier front, along with the presence of sills and inner basins in the fjord, also has a considerable impact on the calving dynamics, and thus on the shape of the calving front. We hypothesise that deep tidewater glaciers, such as Rink (∼ 750 m), which are exposed significantly to warm AW at their base (∼ 75 % at Rink), will be influenced by widespread, submarine melting, which would favour a relatively flat calving face (Fig.…”
Section: Oceanic and Bathymetric Influence On Glacier Front Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At Store Glacier, frontal mass loss during both summers is greater on the southern flank, where a large embayment between two headlands coincides with an upwelling plume visible at the surface. These observations suggest that in addition to the fjord geometrical control on the glacier calving processes (McFadden et al, 2011;Schild and Hamilton, 2013), the presence of warm, subpolar-originating water bodies at the glacier front, along with the presence of sills and inner basins in the fjord, also has a considerable impact on the calving dynamics, and thus on the shape of the calving front. We hypothesise that deep tidewater glaciers, such as Rink (∼ 750 m), which are exposed significantly to warm AW at their base (∼ 75 % at Rink), will be influenced by widespread, submarine melting, which would favour a relatively flat calving face (Fig.…”
Section: Oceanic and Bathymetric Influence On Glacier Front Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Enderlin and others, 2014) or a change in glacier calving style (full-thickness tabular vs smaller sub-thickness icebergs) (e.g. Schild and Hamilton, 2013), will likely result in a change in the magnitude of the distributed freshwater flux from submarine melting of icebergs. Using the DEMdifferencing approach described here, we may be able to quantify spatial and temporal changes in freshwater fluxes in the absence of detailed hydrographic surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lieu of attempting to quantify meltwater run-off, we use positive degree days (PDDs) as a proxy for meltwater availability at Kronebreen and Tunabreen (Hock 2003;Bartholomew et al 2010;Chu et al 2012;Schild and Hamilton 2013). We calculate the daily PDD values using the average daily temperature measurements collected from automatic weather station at Ny-Ålesund (78.92°N, 11.93°E, 8 masl), 15 km west of Kronebreen, and Pyramiden (78.65°N, 16.35°E, 20 masl), 32 km north of Tunabreen.…”
Section: Meltwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate the daily PDD values using the average daily temperature measurements collected from automatic weather station at Ny-Ålesund (78.92°N, 11.93°E, 8 masl), 15 km west of Kronebreen, and Pyramiden (78.65°N, 16.35°E, 20 masl), 32 km north of Tunabreen. Following the methods of Schild and Hamilton (2013), the daily average temperature after the onset of melt is defined as the PDD value for each day. To take into account lags in the hydraulic system introduced by finite transit time of meltwater through the glacier system and potential subglacial storage, we construct a 'lag index' using accumulated PDDs.…”
Section: Meltwatermentioning
confidence: 99%