2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1935306100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonality, density dependence, and population cycles in Hokkaido voles

Abstract: Voles and lemmings show extensive variation in population dynamics regulated across and within species. In an attempt to develop and test generic hypotheses explaining these differences, we studied 84 populations of the gray-sided vole (Clethrionomys rufocanus) in Hokkaido, Japan. We show that these populations are limited by a combination of density-independent factors (such as climate) and density-dependent processes (such as specialist predators). We show that density-dependent regulation primarily occurs i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
169
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
169
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though this technique did not allow us to pinpoint the exact causal chain that generated a change in vole dynamics, the combination of experimental approach (including manipulation and replication, and control of all other factors by virtue of experimental randomisation) and time series analysis allowed us to identify delayed density dependence as the regulatory process affected by livestock grazing with little evidence of direct density dependence being affected. As such, combining time series analysis with a factorial experiment is a methodological step forward relative to previous attempts to link density dependent parameters (probes) to unmanipulated environmental covariates, such as latitude and seasonality (e.g., Bjørnstad et al 1995;Erb et al 2000;Saitoh et al 2003). Another relevant aspect of the method is that, despite time series being relatively short (8 years), the combination of a randomized, replicated large-scale experimental set up with a state-space analytical model was essential to obtain estimates of probes with greater precision and less bias than hitherto feasible (e.g., Hansen et al 1999;Stenseth et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Though this technique did not allow us to pinpoint the exact causal chain that generated a change in vole dynamics, the combination of experimental approach (including manipulation and replication, and control of all other factors by virtue of experimental randomisation) and time series analysis allowed us to identify delayed density dependence as the regulatory process affected by livestock grazing with little evidence of direct density dependence being affected. As such, combining time series analysis with a factorial experiment is a methodological step forward relative to previous attempts to link density dependent parameters (probes) to unmanipulated environmental covariates, such as latitude and seasonality (e.g., Bjørnstad et al 1995;Erb et al 2000;Saitoh et al 2003). Another relevant aspect of the method is that, despite time series being relatively short (8 years), the combination of a randomized, replicated large-scale experimental set up with a state-space analytical model was essential to obtain estimates of probes with greater precision and less bias than hitherto feasible (e.g., Hansen et al 1999;Stenseth et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, combining time series analysis with a factorial experiment is a methodological step forward relative to previous attempts to link density dependent parameters (probes) to unmanipulated environmental covariates, such as latitude and seasonality (e.g., Bjørnstad et al 1995;Erb et al 2000;Saitoh et al 2003). Another relevant aspect of the method is that, despite time series being relatively short (8 years), the combination of a randomized, replicated large-scale experimental set up with a state-space analytical model was essential to obtain estimates of probes with greater precision and less bias than hitherto feasible (e.g., Hansen et al 1999;Stenseth et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously (Stenseth et al 2003 Stenseth et al 2003). Here, we used the minimum number alive (Krebs 1999) as rodent abundance and the number of trap-nights as trapping effort.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%