2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonality in expression and distribution of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in the testis of the catfish, Clarias batrachus: Role of nitric oxide in testosterone production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of exogenous NO donor (sodium nitroprusside-SNP), a NOS inhibitor (N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester-L-NAME), and macrophage-produced NO on testicular production in vivo or in vitro conditions were assessed by analyzing testosterone using ELISA kit. Details of methodology and various control groups for proper comparisons were published elsewhere (Dubey nee Pathak and Lal 2008, 2009, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of exogenous NO donor (sodium nitroprusside-SNP), a NOS inhibitor (N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester-L-NAME), and macrophage-produced NO on testicular production in vivo or in vitro conditions were assessed by analyzing testosterone using ELISA kit. Details of methodology and various control groups for proper comparisons were published elsewhere (Dubey nee Pathak and Lal 2008, 2009, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Creech et al (1998) could not detect NOS activity in sperm but suggested the presence of a trace amount of NO by ESR signal in fathead minnow sperm with seminal plasma. Recent studies have also shown the existence of nNOS and iNOS in advanced germ cells in fish testis (nee Pathak and Lal, 2010) indirectly supporting the hypothesis that fish sperm are capable of generating NO. The presence of NO in sperm has convincingly been demonstrated in a number of mammals (Lewis et al, 1996;Herrero et al, 2000;Goud et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%