2022
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.06461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonality modulates habitat cover effects on avian cross‐boundary responses and spillover

Abstract: Species cross-boundary response is a key mechanism affecting species spillover into agricultural fields. However, temporal changes in edge permeability, which may depend on the seasonal availability of resources in both matrix and native habitats, remain poorly understood. Here we tested how edge crossing behavior and the associated spillover of birds into sun coffee plantations respond to landscape structure and seasonality. We monitored the movement of six insectivorous understory bird species (four forest s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are known of spill-over as cross-habitat movements of organisms, e.g. woodland birds or pollinators that move to adjacent open landscapes, which increase diversity and enhance the flow of beneficial ecosystem services such as pest control or pollination (Boesing et al, 2018; Boesing et al, 2022). Moreover, it is likely that the spill-over of biodiversity into areas adjoining beaver wetlands will lead to a parallel spill-over of ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are known of spill-over as cross-habitat movements of organisms, e.g. woodland birds or pollinators that move to adjacent open landscapes, which increase diversity and enhance the flow of beneficial ecosystem services such as pest control or pollination (Boesing et al, 2018; Boesing et al, 2022). Moreover, it is likely that the spill-over of biodiversity into areas adjoining beaver wetlands will lead to a parallel spill-over of ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on how habitat reduction and fragmentation have been affecting the arrangement of biological communities (ecological drift) and species responses (environmental filtering) have become increasingly common (Morante-Filho et al 2015;Boesing et al 2017;Pardini et al 2017;Adorno et al 2021). However, the role of anthropogenic landscape matrix as a modifying agent of community assemblies still unclear, and the results of habitat loss in communities composition, ecological functions, and ecosystem services provision are barely known (Kupfer et al 2006;Pardini et al 2017;Medeiros et al 2019; Barros et al 2019a;Larissa Boesing et al 2022). A landscape perspective is required to understand the effects of agriculture land use on the biodiversity and ecological processes (e.g., arthropod predation (Tscharntke et al 2005;Turner et al 2013;de Souza Leite et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this patch-matrix paradigm is now considered outdated 35 , 36 . Indeed, land cover types surrounding forest patches are likely to influence biodiversity occurring within these patches 37 , including forest pest’s natural enemies such as birds 13 , 38 . For instance, crop fields and grasslands are likely to provide complementary resources for bird predators occurring in small forest stands 39 41 , and to influence the spillover of arthropod predators from crops and grasslands to forests 39 , 42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%