Big City Politics in Transition 1991
DOI: 10.4135/9781483325781.n14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seattle: Grassroots Politics Shaping the Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 1940 and 1944, regional employment in shipbuilding and aircraft manufacture grew from 14 000 to 132 000 (MacDonald, 1987). Yet the region’s dependence on Boeing could also be a liability as the aerospace sector experienced a series of expansions and contractions coinciding with the beginning and end of major overseas conflicts (Gordon et al . 1991; Gray et al , 1999).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1940 and 1944, regional employment in shipbuilding and aircraft manufacture grew from 14 000 to 132 000 (MacDonald, 1987). Yet the region’s dependence on Boeing could also be a liability as the aerospace sector experienced a series of expansions and contractions coinciding with the beginning and end of major overseas conflicts (Gordon et al . 1991; Gray et al , 1999).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six regimes, in the cities of Atlanta, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis, were classified as developmental. Fort Lauderdale Stone (1989Stone ( , 2001 Baltimore Progressive Levine (1987), Orr (1992), Stoker (1987) Chicago Developmental Bennett et al (1988), Mier, Moe, and Sherr (1986), Ferman (1996) Detroit Developmental Klemanski (1993, 1999), Orr and Stoker (1994), Rich (1991) Ft. Lauderdale Caretaker Turner (1992), Vogel (1992) Houston Developmental Capek and Gilderbloom (1992), Feagin (1988), Parker and Feagin (1990), Thomas and Murray (1992) Minneapolis Progressive Nickel (1995) New Orleans Caretaker Whelan (1987), Whelan and Young (1991), Whelan, Young, and Lauria (1994) Pittsburgh Developmental Ferman (1996) Portland Progressive Leo (1998) San Francisco Progressive DeLeon (1991, 1992a, 1992b), Keating (1986) Seattle Progressive Gordon et al (1991) St. Louis Developmental Glassberg (1991) Tampa Progressive Kerstein (1991), Turner (1992) and New Orleans were classified as caretaker. The remaining six cities, Baltimore, Portland, Minneapolis, Tampa, San Francisco, and Seattle, were governed by a progressive regime.…”
Section: Comparing Us Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, although this configuration displays a common pattern across the three cities, all of the authors emphasize the importance of cultural factors in reorienting the regimes toward progressive concerns. In the cases of Seattle and Portland, both Gordon et al (1991) and Leo (1998) describe the ascendancy of a middle-class population concerned with environmental protection, whereas DeLeon (1991) chronicles the growth of a postmaterialist population that supported the progressive regimes in San Francisco.…”
Section: A Qca Of Urban Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are there a large number of active groups, there are also an unusual number of federations of groups. City elections are at-large; they are bipartisan but all mayors since 1970 have been Democrats (Gordon et al, 1991). 75% of Seattle's population is white; the Asian (11.8%), black (10.1 %) and Hispanic (3.6%) population is growing steadily, with Asians increasing most rapidly.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%