2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seawater reverse osmosis with isobaric energy recovery devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercial products of piston type ERD are known as DWEER of Flowserve and SalTec DT of KSB [8][9][10], which have demonstrated excellent operational performances, such as high energy recovery efficiency and reliability, in industrial seawater reverse osmosis plants [11][12][13][14][15]. However, the advantages of the piston type ERD, especially the good operational flexibility under condition of variable pressures and different capacities brought by the adoptive signal control mode have rarely been displayed and reported in literatures [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Commercial products of piston type ERD are known as DWEER of Flowserve and SalTec DT of KSB [8][9][10], which have demonstrated excellent operational performances, such as high energy recovery efficiency and reliability, in industrial seawater reverse osmosis plants [11][12][13][14][15]. However, the advantages of the piston type ERD, especially the good operational flexibility under condition of variable pressures and different capacities brought by the adoptive signal control mode have rarely been displayed and reported in literatures [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This paper focuses on the piston type ERD which has been widely used in large scale RO desalination projects [11][12][13][14], due to its exceptional efficiency, operational flexibility and high availability [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical PRO design technically requires the use of a PX to sustain a continuous operation. However, the efficiency of a PX typically ranges from 82% to 98% [42,43], which suggests that the stream pressurized by the PX still requires extra energy to further boost its pressure to working pressure (i.e. the applied hydraulic pressure of the draw solution).…”
Section: Energy Loss Due To Inefficient Pressure Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%