2019
DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seaweed-eating sheep and the adaptation of husbandry in Neolithic Orkney: new insights from Skara Brae

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the only two adult sheep from the same site (albeit likely different individuals to those analysed for δ 13 Cenamel) that were analysed for δ 13 Ccollagen did not show evidence of seaweed consumption (−19.8 ‰ and −20.1 ‰; Schulting and Richards, 2009). A similar discrepancy between enamel and bone δ 13 C results at site level was found at Skara Brae, where sheep collagen δ 13 C results were comparatively low (−21.1 ‰ to −20.3 ‰; Jones and Mulville, 2016), yet sequential tooth enamel δ 13 C analyses indicated substantial seasonal seaweed consumption (Balasse et al, 2019). Similarly, at the Knap of Howar, recent reinterpretation of sequential δ 13 Cenamel results indicates seasonal seaweed consumption in small amounts by some sheep (Balasse et al, 2019(Balasse et al, , 2006, while δ 13 Ccollagen results (potentially performed on different sheep; ranging from −20.7 ‰ to −18.8 ‰) have been interpreted as not being indicative of seaweed consumption (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2002;Schulting and Richards, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the only two adult sheep from the same site (albeit likely different individuals to those analysed for δ 13 Cenamel) that were analysed for δ 13 Ccollagen did not show evidence of seaweed consumption (−19.8 ‰ and −20.1 ‰; Schulting and Richards, 2009). A similar discrepancy between enamel and bone δ 13 C results at site level was found at Skara Brae, where sheep collagen δ 13 C results were comparatively low (−21.1 ‰ to −20.3 ‰; Jones and Mulville, 2016), yet sequential tooth enamel δ 13 C analyses indicated substantial seasonal seaweed consumption (Balasse et al, 2019). Similarly, at the Knap of Howar, recent reinterpretation of sequential δ 13 Cenamel results indicates seasonal seaweed consumption in small amounts by some sheep (Balasse et al, 2019(Balasse et al, , 2006, while δ 13 Ccollagen results (potentially performed on different sheep; ranging from −20.7 ‰ to −18.8 ‰) have been interpreted as not being indicative of seaweed consumption (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2002;Schulting and Richards, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…A similar discrepancy between enamel and bone δ 13 C results at site level was found at Skara Brae, where sheep collagen δ 13 C results were comparatively low (−21.1 ‰ to −20.3 ‰; Jones and Mulville, 2016), yet sequential tooth enamel δ 13 C analyses indicated substantial seasonal seaweed consumption (Balasse et al, 2019). Similarly, at the Knap of Howar, recent reinterpretation of sequential δ 13 Cenamel results indicates seasonal seaweed consumption in small amounts by some sheep (Balasse et al, 2019(Balasse et al, , 2006, while δ 13 Ccollagen results (potentially performed on different sheep; ranging from −20.7 ‰ to −18.8 ‰) have been interpreted as not being indicative of seaweed consumption (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2002;Schulting and Richards, 2009). In contrast, distinctly marineinfluenced δ 13 Ccollagen values (−18.6 ‰ to around -13 ‰) have been found in five young lambs from Holm of Papa Westray North Cairn and Neolithic Quanterness, Orkney (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2009Schulting et al, 2004Schulting et al, , 2017Schulting and Richards, 2009), whereas δ 13 Ccollagen of older sheep from the same sites did not clearly indicate a marine influence (Schulting and Richards, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Values below –22.5‰ in collagen can be considered as the key value for grazing in open areas and an indication of resources from a closed-canopy environment [ 68 ]. Contribution of resources from marine/estuarine environments leads to elevated δ 13 C and δ 15 N values in bone collagen, whereas freshwater/riverine components will be reflected in low δ 13 C values compared to the terrestrial ecosystems [ 69 , 70 ]. Saltmarsh grazing is proved to elevate the δ 15 N values significantly (approximately 3‰) compared to other terrestrial resources as a result of salinity and sea-spray effect [ 71 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%