1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb00371.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sebaceous differentiation in a breast carcinoma with ductal, myoepithelial and squamous elements

Abstract: documents the recurrence of a lesion with the features of giant cell fibroblastoma 3 years after the local excision of a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and, while supporting their close relationship, suggests that their different morphological manifestations are not simply age related. Case reportA 17-year-old male was noted to have a mass present in the left groin for several months. This was excised at another hospital. At age 20, he underwent re-excision of a recurrent tumour from the same region. PATHOLOG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
34
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the clinicopathologic findings, the current tumor is analogous to those previously reported as mammary carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation or sebaceous carcinoma of the breast [6,7,12,15,16]. As the initial identification as a variant of lipid-secreting carcinoma [15], sebaceous differentiation has been rarely described in variable morphologic types of mammary carcinoma, such as infiltrating (or invasive) ductal carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and a carcinoma with ductal, myoepithelial and squamous elements [6,7,12,14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the clinicopathologic findings, the current tumor is analogous to those previously reported as mammary carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation or sebaceous carcinoma of the breast [6,7,12,15,16]. As the initial identification as a variant of lipid-secreting carcinoma [15], sebaceous differentiation has been rarely described in variable morphologic types of mammary carcinoma, such as infiltrating (or invasive) ductal carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and a carcinoma with ductal, myoepithelial and squamous elements [6,7,12,14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As the initial identification as a variant of lipid-secreting carcinoma [15], sebaceous differentiation has been rarely described in variable morphologic types of mammary carcinoma, such as infiltrating (or invasive) ductal carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and a carcinoma with ductal, myoepithelial and squamous elements [6,7,12,14,16]. In addition, a single case of sebaceous gland metaplasia in intraductal papilloma has been recently described [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few cases of invasive ductal carcinoma with a minor sebaceous component (i.e. < 50%) have also been described [2,10,11]. Moreover, sebaceous differentiation rarely occurs in other malignant and benign mammary lesions: adenoid cystic carcinoma [13], cylindroma [14], adenomyoepithelioma [15,16] or intraductal papilloma [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been described in 15 cases so far in the English-language literature, either as a minor or predominant component in a classical ductal carcinoma or as a pure line of differentiation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. According to the current WHO classification, primary sebaceous carcinoma of the breast must show sebaceous differentiation in at least 50% of cells and have no evidence of origin from the cutaneous adnexa [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squamous metaplasia is suggested to be associated with sebaceous differentiation in human mammary tumors. 2,9,11,13 Furthermore, canine squamous metaplasia has not been reported to be accompanied by sebaceous differentiation in a case of mammary carcinoma. 3 In the current case, the squamous epithelium was partially continuous with a sebaceous structure, indicating close association between these 2 components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%