Second-Chance Signal Transduction Explains Cooperative Flagellar Switching

Abstract

The reversal of flagellar motion (switching) results from the interaction between a switch complex of the flagellar rotor and a torque-generating stationary unit, or stator (motor unit). To explain the steeply cooperative ligand-induced switching, present models propose allosteric interactions between subunits of the rotor, but do not address the possibility of a reaction that stimulates a bidirectional motor unit to reverse direction of torque. During flagellar motion, the binding of a ligand-bound switch complex at the dwell site could excite a motor unit. The probability that another switch complex of the rotor, moving according to steady-state rotation, will reach the same dwell site before that motor unit returns to ground state will be determined by the independent decay rate of the excited-state motor unit. Here, we derive an analytical expression for the energy coupling between a switch complex and a motor unit of the stator complex of a flagellum, and demonstrate that this model accounts for the cooperative switching response without the need for allosteric interactions. The analytical result can be reproduced by simulation when (1) the motion of the rotor delivers a subsequent ligand-bound switch to the excited motor unit, thereby providing the excited motor unit with a second chance to remain excited, and (2) the outputs from multiple independent motor units are constrained to a single all-or-none event. In this proposed model, a motor unit and switch complex represent the components of a mathematically defined signal transduction mechanism in which energy coupling is driven by steady-state and is regulated by stochastic ligand binding. Mathematical derivation of the model shows the analytical function to be a general form of the Hill equation (Hill AV (1910) The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol 40: iv–vii).

Enhanced troponin I binding explains the functional changes produced by the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation A8V of cardiac troponin C

“…2), where K 0 ′ includes the number of Tm molecules functioning as an ensemble ( n > 1). In addition, the odds of regenerating M without decay to C (α) is included in the mathematical expression of M , $$M=K_0^{\prime }C{(1+(\alpha -1\left)M\right)}^n$$ that is derived for the steady-state (36). C is the only Ca 2+ -dependent variable of Eq.…”

“…Instead, the activated state requires only Tm in the C position and force-bearing cycling crossbridges, consistent with consensus observations (41). Cooperative activation (39) without direct participation of ligand, i.e ., non-allosteric cooperativity, is a hallmark of a second chance mechanism (36). The statistical basis of a second chance mechanism can be linked to fundamental thermodynamic properties of systems that couple equilibrium and kinetic forces, such as forces acting on Tm by cycling crossbridges (42).…”

Finite Element Model of Oxygen Transport for the Design of Geometrically Complex Microfluidic Devices Used in Biological Studies

“…The different regions of the device are designated by Ω j , where the subscripts j = pdms , g , rbc , p represent the PDMS, gas, red blood cells and plasma respectively. The derivative can be found from the Hill equation [28]: where SO 2 is hemoglobin oxygen saturation, N is the Hill coefficient and P 50 is the partial pressure of oxygen at 50% saturation.…”

Serotonin Transporter in Lymphocytes of Rats Exposed to Physical Restraint Stress

“…Three milliliters of toluene/Omnifluor 0.4% were added to each vial, and radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Packard Tri-Carb Model 1900 TR Model 81910; USA) with an efficiency of 65%. Saturation experiments were performed to calculate the parameters Bmax, Kd [30] and n H [31]. …”

“…InStat 3.0 was used for statistical comparisons with ANOVA, and Graph Pad Prism 4.0 was used to calculate Bmax and Kd using data from saturation assays. n H was calculated from the Hill linearization equation for cooperative binding curves [31]. O.D.…”