1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00692448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-harmonic detection with tunable diode lasers ? Comparison of experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
236
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 595 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
236
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal modulation index for 2f detection (m = 2.2 as shown by Reid and Labrie, 1981) cannot be reached with the current QC laser used in our system due to limited current tuning range, which decreases with increasing modulation frequency (Tao et al, 2012a). We can only achieve a modulation index of ∼ 1.4 for NH 3 measurements.…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal modulation index for 2f detection (m = 2.2 as shown by Reid and Labrie, 1981) cannot be reached with the current QC laser used in our system due to limited current tuning range, which decreases with increasing modulation frequency (Tao et al, 2012a). We can only achieve a modulation index of ∼ 1.4 for NH 3 measurements.…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As shown in Fig. 2b, second harmonic (2f) detection minimizes the water vapor absorption baseline and improves sensitivity and selectivity (Reid and Labrie, 1981). Other atmospheric species such as CO 2 , O 3 and SO 2 also absorb in this region below ∼ 5×10 −5 fractional absorption.…”
Section: Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 1 second of averaging, the corresponding numbers are 5 × 10 −7 and 9 × 10 −7 , respectively. The decrease in sensitivity at higher harmonics is to be expected due to the lower signal values [23,24]. Although the 1f -WMS signal provides the strongest WMS signal, it is often not selected due to the unwanted RAM offset and the higher sensitivity to optical noise.…”
Section: System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, different molecules can be identified while avoiding interference from other spectra. According to this technique, the near-infrared waveband is matched with the low-loss window of an optical fiber, and by using such optical fibers, the remote transport of a light beam is realized [3][4][5][6]. Moreover, the remote, on-line, and real-time detection of the gas concentration is achieved by combining TDLAS and optical fiber sensing techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%