2014
DOI: 10.1080/19407963.2014.933228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second homes, legal framework and planning practice according to environmental sustainability in coastal areas: the Swedish setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current trend was a shrinking number of second homes, due to their conversion into primary residences (see also Müller & Marjavaara, 2012). Persson (2011Persson ( , 2015 and Gallent (2007) discuss how local communities are affected by conflicting legislation and discourse based on the notion that a second home is a differentand more or less implicitly lesserform of dwelling than a primary residence. The converted weekend municipalities conveyed this duality, ruling out differentiation due to the Planning and Building Act (2010) while at the same time restricting building sizes so much that it would be unappealing for second-home owners to begin using their houses as primary residences.…”
Section: Converted Weekend Municipalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current trend was a shrinking number of second homes, due to their conversion into primary residences (see also Müller & Marjavaara, 2012). Persson (2011Persson ( , 2015 and Gallent (2007) discuss how local communities are affected by conflicting legislation and discourse based on the notion that a second home is a differentand more or less implicitly lesserform of dwelling than a primary residence. The converted weekend municipalities conveyed this duality, ruling out differentiation due to the Planning and Building Act (2010) while at the same time restricting building sizes so much that it would be unappealing for second-home owners to begin using their houses as primary residences.…”
Section: Converted Weekend Municipalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though exact numbers are somewhat uncertain because of statistical definitions, the estimate is about 600,000-650,000 rural properties. Hence, a majority of the population has access to a second home and they can be found all over the country, though those along the coast, on the outskirts of urban areas, and at mountain resorts are particularly numerous and attractive (Marjavaara & Müller, 2007;Müller, 2002Müller, , 2006Persson, 2015).…”
Section: Second Homes In Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there has certainly been a reason for the critical assessment of second homes, perspectives have changed, increasingly highlighting their positive aspects as well. Hence, it has been argued and shown that clear distinctions between primary and second homes as well as permanent and temporary inhabitants are increasingly problematic, not least because of a growing mobility blurring borders between categories (Barnett, 2014;Farstad & Rye, 2013;Gallent, 2007;Jennings & Krannich, 2013;Persson, 2015). Ellingsen (2017) even argues that the study of rural development should always include second home mobility, since it is an integrated part of rural demography and economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Czarnecki and Frenkel (2014) highlight the issues associated with second home definition as it affects statistical collection and therefore policy development in the Polish context. Osbaldiston, Picken, and Duffy (2014) examine the issue of future use of land by second home owners and their implications for infrastructure, planning and sustainability, concerns that are also raised in the work of Persson (2014) in Sweden and Rey-Valette, Rulleau, Hennequin, Meur-Férec, and Flanquart (2014) in France. Drawing on a series of Finnish cases Rinne et al (2014) discuss issues of second home owner participation in planning and decision-making, while the final contribution is that of Åkerlund et al (2014) who provide a multi-scale perspective on governance of international second homes in Finland and Malta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns over large temporary populations are also reflected in much of the writing on the environmental impacts of second homes (Morris & Dickinson, 1987;Sargent & Berke, 1979), together with potential effects on amenity values (Juvik, Juvik, & Hamilton, 1992;Kondo, Rivera, & Rullman, 2012;Vera Rebollo & Ivars Baidal, 2003). Indeed, there is a growing interest in the environmental dimensions of second homes (Andersen, Christensen, Jensen, Kofoed, & Morthorst, 2008;Goble, Lewis, Hill, & Phillips, 2014;Hao, Long, & Hoggard, 2014;Huhtala & Lankia, 2012;Jeong, García-Moruno, Hernández-Blanco, & Jaraíz-Cabanillas, 2014;Lanza & Randazzo, 2013;Long & Hoogendoorn, 2013), which also has significant planning impact as a result of debates over the split of the costs of infrastructure provision between permanent and non-permanent provision (Grahn-Voorneveld, 2012) and implementation of planning law (Persson, 2014).…”
Section: Planning and Policy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%