2021
DOI: 10.1049/mia2.12126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second‐kind Fredholm integral‐equation analysis of scattering by layered dielectric gratings

Abstract: Scattering of the E-polarised plane electromagnetic wave from two different but of the same-period all-dielectric rectangular bar gratings on substrates is analysed using a volume-integral-equation (VIE) method. Here, VIE is a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind with unknown function being the electric field in the gratings regions. Discretisation of the VIE is performed by applying an entire-domain Galerkin technique. The developed algorithm possesses guaranteed convergence, provides accuracy, and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous example, the convergence behavior of the echowidth obtained by the proposed method was verified by calculating the normalized errors of the series coefficient 𝐴 in (21) for different values of 𝑀 using the following equation [22]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the previous example, the convergence behavior of the echowidth obtained by the proposed method was verified by calculating the normalized errors of the series coefficient 𝐴 in (21) for different values of 𝑀 using the following equation [22]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As can be seen in Figure 2, the electric field |Ez| ${\vert E}_{z}\vert $ for both cases converges as M increases. To show the convergence behaviour of the unknown coefficients, we also plotted the truncation error of the series coefficient Cm ${C}_{m}$ in Figure 2c for the large cavity case [17]. As illustrated in Figure 2c, when M $M$ increases, first the truncation error increases then decreases rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the MoM as the reference, it can be deduced from the results shown in Figure 3 that the suggested method is accurate for both cases of small and large trapezoidal groove. We also inspected the normalised errors of the series coefficient H 01m through Equation ( 22) as follows [20]: ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the MoM as the reference, it can be deduced from the results shown in Figure 3 that the suggested method is accurate for both cases of small and large trapezoidal groove. We also inspected the normalised errors of the series coefficient H 01 m through Equation () as follows [20]: error(M)=n=0MH01m0.25emnMH01m0.25emnM1|2n=0N|H01mnM|2 $\text{error}(M)=\sqrt{\frac{\sum\limits _{n=0}^{M}{{{H}_{01m}\,}_{n}^{M}-{{H}_{01m}\,}_{n}^{M-1}\vert }^{2}}{\sum\limits _{n=0}^{N}{\vert {{H}_{01m}\,}_{n}^{M}\vert }^{2}}}$ Figure 4 depicts normalised truncation errors versus the number of M for the large right trapezoidal groove described in the caption of Figure 3. According to Figure 4, the truncation error decreases as the truncation number M increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%