Second and Foreign Language Education 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Language Education in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different than when Francophone teachers were hired into the FI program in the 1960s, today there have been changes to the teacher population necessarily expanding beyond Francophones to include graduates of the FI program as well as graduates from other FSL programs in an attempt to meet the demand for the program (Early et al, 2017). Universities across Canada offering teacher preparation programs recognize the responsibility of preparing teachers not only in terms of pedagogy related to the profession, but also providing opportunities for L2 speakers to engage and use French (Smith et al, 2023).…”
Section: Teaching In the Fi Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different than when Francophone teachers were hired into the FI program in the 1960s, today there have been changes to the teacher population necessarily expanding beyond Francophones to include graduates of the FI program as well as graduates from other FSL programs in an attempt to meet the demand for the program (Early et al, 2017). Universities across Canada offering teacher preparation programs recognize the responsibility of preparing teachers not only in terms of pedagogy related to the profession, but also providing opportunities for L2 speakers to engage and use French (Smith et al, 2023).…”
Section: Teaching In the Fi Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although L2 teacher education research has promoted dialogic practices that are enmeshed with classroom realities, how this is reflected in teacher education programs remains underexplored (Johnson, 2015). Indeed, in the Canadian context, numerous challenges and gaps have been identified relating to the preparation (Arnott & Vignola, 2018;Huhn et al, 2021), mentorship (Kastelan-Sikora, 2013Muhling, 2016), and the retention of FSL teachers (Masson et al, 2019;Swanson, 2012) within specific institutional and regional contexts (for more information on second language education in Canada generally, see Early et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in his fifth report, the Commissioner of Official Languages recommended the "youth option", which involved "shifting the focus of language policy to effective language education for children, so that they would grow up to become bilingual adults" (Hayday, 2013, p. 32). The federal government supported such recommendations by contributing a portion of the cost of provincial second official language education through the Official Languages in Education (OLE) program (Early et al, 2017); since 1970, over $7 billion has been spent by this program (Hayday, 2013). This massive investment in second official language education contributed to the explosion of various forms of French Immersion (FI) programs across the country since the 1970s (Dicks & Genesee, 2017).…”
Section: Language Education In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%