The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Language Word Diffi culty

Abstract: To understand why some words are easy and some are difficult for second language learners, we should first clarify what is meant by knowing a word.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using the second approach, however, have often failed to control item difficulty between the semantically related and unrelated sets. Research suggests that several factors affect the learning burden of L2-L1 word pairs (e.g., Barcroft & Rott, 2010;Laufer, 2012;Schmitt, 2010). Factors related to L2 words include L2 word frequency (Lotto & de Groot, 1998), L2 word length (Ellis & Beaton, 1993), and pronounceability ( de Groot, 2006; de Groot & van Hell, 2005;Ellis & Beaton, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using the second approach, however, have often failed to control item difficulty between the semantically related and unrelated sets. Research suggests that several factors affect the learning burden of L2-L1 word pairs (e.g., Barcroft & Rott, 2010;Laufer, 2012;Schmitt, 2010). Factors related to L2 words include L2 word frequency (Lotto & de Groot, 1998), L2 word length (Ellis & Beaton, 1993), and pronounceability ( de Groot, 2006; de Groot & van Hell, 2005;Ellis & Beaton, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that the effects of PAL may be affected by factors such as the direction (i.e., receptive or productive) and frequency of retrieval, type of elaboration (i.e., semantic or structural), type of information provided (e.g., fi rst language [L1] translations, context, or pictures), type and timing of feedback, and interference as well as item-related factors such as word length, parts of speech, pronounceability, concept imageability, and concept frequency (for reviews, see Laufer, 2012 ;Nation, 2001 ). Research also shows that in PAL, spaced learning, which involves spacing between repetitions of a given item, yields superior retention than does massed learning, which does not involve any spacing; this phenomenon is known as the spacing effect (e.g., Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006 ;Cull, 2000 ;Cull, Shaughnessy, & Zechmeister, 1996 ;Karpicke & Bauernschmidt, 2011 ;Karpicke & Roediger, 2007 ;Logan & Balota, 2008 ;Maddox, Balota, Coane, & Duchek, 2011 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem is the lexical gap between the Turkish and English, investigated and discussed under the heading of lexical void in the literature (Blum & Levenston, 1978;Koren, 1997;Laufer, 2013;Shlesinger & Almog, 2011;Uzun, 2011). Anxiety, attitude and aptitude also create problems.…”
Section: Lexical Voids Translation and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%