2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second law analysis of water flow through smooth microtubes under adiabatic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 q and with lower d. The present evaluations can be detailed by the two fundamental reporting: Promoted total entropy generation (i) with low micropipe diameters and high fluid velocities is due to frictional entropy generation (Table 1), (ii) with the application of higher heat flux, bigger micropipe diameters and low Reynolds numbers count on thermal generation rates (Table 2). Enhanced entropy generation rates with higher Reynolds numbers and lower micropipe diameters are as well reported by Avci & Aydin (2007), Hooman (2008) and Parlak et al (2011). In addition to the above determinations, through the ratio of S is identified with the following comparison rates of 3.692→2.068 (d=1.00→0.50 mm) (Re=100), 1.782→1.064 (Re=500), 1.241→1.015 (Re=1000) and 1.061→1.003 (Re=2000).…”
Section: S/ Smentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 q and with lower d. The present evaluations can be detailed by the two fundamental reporting: Promoted total entropy generation (i) with low micropipe diameters and high fluid velocities is due to frictional entropy generation (Table 1), (ii) with the application of higher heat flux, bigger micropipe diameters and low Reynolds numbers count on thermal generation rates (Table 2). Enhanced entropy generation rates with higher Reynolds numbers and lower micropipe diameters are as well reported by Avci & Aydin (2007), Hooman (2008) and Parlak et al (2011). In addition to the above determinations, through the ratio of S is identified with the following comparison rates of 3.692→2.068 (d=1.00→0.50 mm) (Re=100), 1.782→1.064 (Re=500), 1.241→1.015 (Re=1000) and 1.061→1.003 (Re=2000).…”
Section: S/ Smentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Guo & Li (2003) studied the mechanism of surface roughness provoked surface friction and concluded that the early transition from laminar to turbulent flow arose due to the frictional activity. Smooth micro-tubes under adiabatic conditions were experimentally investigated by Parlak et al (2011); they determined that, as long as the viscous heating effects are taken into account for micropipe diameters of d<100 µm, the measured data and the calculated data from Hagen-Poiseuille equation of laminar flow are fairly comparable. The works of Celata et al (2006a,b) described the roles of surface roughness on viscous dissipation, the resulting earlier transitional activity, augmented friction factor values and elevated head loss data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They showed that entropy generation regions are related to the thermal non-equilibrium regions in the flow field. Parlak et al [27] studied steady-laminar flow of water in adiabatic microtubes experimentally and analytically. Through employing the second law analysis, they showed that the flow characteristics in the smooth microtubes distinguish substantially from the conventional theory for flow in larger tubes with respect to viscous heating/dissipation, temperature rise of flow, total entropy generation rate and lost work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%