2004
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000106944.59990.e6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-line anticonvulsant treatment of neonatal seizures

Abstract: The authors conducted a randomized trial of second-line anticonvulsant treatments for neonates. The response to treatment was assessed using continuous video-EEG because the clinical diagnosis of seizure in neonates is known to be unreliable. Of 27 neonates with EEG-confirmed seizures, 5 were excluded because of protocol violations, and 11 responded to phenobarbitone in a dose of 40 mg/kg as first line. Three of five neonates treated with lignocaine responded. Six neonates were treated with benzodiazepines as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
119
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
119
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 21 articles included in the review, 20 were original studies, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] with one companion abstract publication identified. 27 The companion abstract was included for completeness 27 and was not included for the rest of the review to avoid duplication of patient data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 21 articles included in the review, 20 were original studies, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] with one companion abstract publication identified. 27 The companion abstract was included for completeness 27 and was not included for the rest of the review to avoid duplication of patient data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 15 original retrospective studies 15,16,18,20,21,[23][24][25][26]28,30,[32][33][34][35] and five prospective studies. 17,19,22,29,31 Within the retrospective studies, 12 were retrospective case series 15,16,18,20,21,24,26,28,30,32,34,35 and the remaining three were retrospective case reports. 23,25,33 All studies were based in single centers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations