2012
DOI: 10.1586/era.12.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-line systemic therapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer

Abstract: The discovery of molecular mechanisms driving the progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to the development of drugs that target RCC at the molecular level. Inhibition of VEGF-targeting pathways is successful as a front-line treatment in patients with metastatic RCC. In addition, bevacizumab/IFN-α, sunitinib and pazopanib are recommended for first-line use in good- or intermediate-risk patients, whereas temsirolimus is approved for poor-risk patients. Second-line options are valuable as these patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not directly assessing dose intensity, our current findings did show that, compared to patients treated with everolimus, those treated with axitinib were more likely to initiate therapy at a higher-than-recommended dose and were more likely to dose escalate. Together with the modeling study by Perrin et al 19 , the current findings indicate that everolimus might be a less costly option in routine clinical practice relative to axitinib, which provide additional real-world evidence to help decisionmaking regarding the optimal treatment sequencing for aRCC [26][27][28][29][30] . This study is subject to several limitations, some of which are inherent to retrospective reviews of medical chart data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although not directly assessing dose intensity, our current findings did show that, compared to patients treated with everolimus, those treated with axitinib were more likely to initiate therapy at a higher-than-recommended dose and were more likely to dose escalate. Together with the modeling study by Perrin et al 19 , the current findings indicate that everolimus might be a less costly option in routine clinical practice relative to axitinib, which provide additional real-world evidence to help decisionmaking regarding the optimal treatment sequencing for aRCC [26][27][28][29][30] . This study is subject to several limitations, some of which are inherent to retrospective reviews of medical chart data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These treatments improved patients’ median overall survival up to 26 months, but prognosis is still limited, as long-term responders are rare. Therefore, there is the definitive need for the improvement of therapeutic concepts, since progressive disease will develop, due to the inevitable development of a multi-drug resistance in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients [2]. For future therapies of mRCC, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, as a key regulator of cellular homeostasis in adult tissues and cell-to-cell interactions during embryogenesis, was proposed as a promising candidate [3–9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restaging showed a progressive pulmonal and bone metastatic disease without recurrence of the bladder lesion ten weeks after the start of systemic therapy. Due to lack of evidence-based second line treatment after mTOR based therapy failure, the therapy was switched to sunitinib malate 50 mg daily on a 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule 11 . The patient presented in reduced general conditions with ascites, general anasarca and symptoms of a paralytic ileus 6 weeks after the start of sunitinib malate.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%