2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2116596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-Line Tisagenlecleucel or Standard Care in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
301
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
301
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional 7% did not receive an infusion due to manufacturing failures ( 3 ). Similar data was reported from 2 nd -line auto-CAR studies in which bridging was permitted ( 6 , 12 ). The need for bridging chemotherapy likely reflects more aggressive disease biology, as retrospective analyses have shown that patients who receive bridging have higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and International Prognostic Index scores, disease stage, bulky disease (> 10 cm), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels at the start of therapy ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…An additional 7% did not receive an infusion due to manufacturing failures ( 3 ). Similar data was reported from 2 nd -line auto-CAR studies in which bridging was permitted ( 6 , 12 ). The need for bridging chemotherapy likely reflects more aggressive disease biology, as retrospective analyses have shown that patients who receive bridging have higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and International Prognostic Index scores, disease stage, bulky disease (> 10 cm), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels at the start of therapy ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, patients with early relapse following first-line therapy have a poor prognosis, with a 50% rate of overall survival when treated with the currently available therapies [ 46 ]. Based on results of trials comparing CAR-T cell with SOC, investigators from TRANSFORM and ZUMA-7 studies support the respective CAR-T cell products as potential second-line (2L) treatment for patients with R/R DLBCL [ 47 , 48 ]. On the other hand, investigators of the BELINDA study state that insights from a longer follow-up and additional studies of this randomized Phase 3 trial will inform the possible use of tisagenlecleucel in the 2L R/R DLBCL setting [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interim analysis of the TRANSFORM trial, median EFS in the 92 patients who received lisocabtagene maraleucel was 10.1 compared to 2.3 months among the 92 patients treated with standard of care. These data were contrasted by the BELINDA ( 24 ) study (NCT03570892), using tisagenlecleucel, which showed no difference in outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%