1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199905)21:3<204::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second neoplasm in patients with head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
206
2
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
206
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that distant metastases were underdiagnosed when they were synchronous with non-salvageable local or regional recurrences. The incidence of second tumors was lower than has been found in other studies, 12 possibly influenced by losses from follow-up and the higher disease stages in these patients. Monthly follow-up for long periods becomes impracticable for both the medical team and the patient.…”
Section: Copyright © 2003 Associação Paulista De Medicinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that distant metastases were underdiagnosed when they were synchronous with non-salvageable local or regional recurrences. The incidence of second tumors was lower than has been found in other studies, 12 possibly influenced by losses from follow-up and the higher disease stages in these patients. Monthly follow-up for long periods becomes impracticable for both the medical team and the patient.…”
Section: Copyright © 2003 Associação Paulista De Medicinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Second, there is substantial reduction in the patient's quality of life after radiotherapy of the oral cavity. [5][6][7][8][9][10] The data reported in the literature allow the hypothesis that early oral squamous cell carcinoma, stage T1-2, is adequately treated by en bloc resection with tumor-free margins [11][12][13][14][15] without subsequent radiotherapy, provided that a maximum of one lymph node has been invaded by the tumor and no rupture of the capsule has taken place.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, oesophageal cancer was the most common SPM in patients with HSCC, which is consistent with previous findings (4)(5)(6)10). Since oesophageal cancer shows a much poorer outcome than head and neck cancer, oesophageal cancer stage was found to be a crucial prognostic factor, including for HSCC patients with SPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%