2016
DOI: 10.1137/141000415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Order Analysis for Strong Solutions in the Optimal Control of Parabolic Equations

Abstract: In this paper we provide a second order analysis for strong solutions in the optimal control of parabolic equations. We consider the case of box constraints on the control and final integral constraints on the state. In contrast to sufficient conditions assuring quadratic growth in the weak sense, i.e. when the cost increases at least quadratically for admissible controls uniformly near to the nominal one (see e.g. [16,26]), our main result provides a sufficient condition for quadratic growth of the cost for a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our results are similar to the ones of [1], [2], they are more general than those of [1], [2]. In particular, we admit the case of a vanishing Tikhonov regularization parameter ν, while ν > 0 is required in [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although our results are similar to the ones of [1], [2], they are more general than those of [1], [2]. In particular, we admit the case of a vanishing Tikhonov regularization parameter ν, while ν > 0 is required in [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, an unknown referee called our attention to the preprint [2] on a parabolic control problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is described in the textbooks [14,27] and was developed in the last two decades. We invite the reader to refer to [5,7,22,26,3] and the references therein on this topic. The main difficulty in the derivation of sufficient optimality conditions, called two-norm discrepancy, lies in the fact that the cost function is twice differentiable for the L ∞ -norm, but one can only assume that its Hessian is coercive for the L 2 -norm on an appropriate subspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Cū is the cone Cū = {v ∈ L 2 (Q) satisfying the sign condition (2) and J ′ (ū; v) = 0}, v(x, t) ≥ 0 ifū(x, t) = α, ≤ 0 ifū(x, t) = β.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%