2011
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.10090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order bias-corrected AIC in multivariate normal linear models under non-normality

Abstract: This paper deals with correcting a bias of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) for selecting variables in multivariate normal linear regression models when the true distribution of observation is an unknown nonnormal distribution. It is well known that the bias of AIC is O(1), and there are several information criteria which improve the bias to O(n −1 ), where n is the sample size. By slightly adjusting the first-order bias-corrected AIC, we propose a new information criterion. Although the adjustment merely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments in estimating bias in multivariate regression, which is equivalent to ICA/PCA with all sources being Gaussian, offer some hope that this problem might nonetheless be tractable. By adjusting the formula for the optimized log-likelihood itself, Yanagihara, Kamo and Tonda [ 47 ] were able to eliminate the bias term involving the multivariate kurtosis of the underlying distribution even though the underlying distribution is unknown. Unfortunately, the derivation of this adjusted formula involves equalities that do not generalize to the broader context of ICA, but future work might identify an alternative formula that does.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in estimating bias in multivariate regression, which is equivalent to ICA/PCA with all sources being Gaussian, offer some hope that this problem might nonetheless be tractable. By adjusting the formula for the optimized log-likelihood itself, Yanagihara, Kamo and Tonda [ 47 ] were able to eliminate the bias term involving the multivariate kurtosis of the underlying distribution even though the underlying distribution is unknown. Unfortunately, the derivation of this adjusted formula involves equalities that do not generalize to the broader context of ICA, but future work might identify an alternative formula that does.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multivariate linear regression model, Yanagihara (2006) proposed an information criterion made from the CV method. Yanagihara et al. (2011) corrected a bias of this criterion and gave the theoretical proof that the standard deviation of the bias‐corrected criterion becomes smaller than that of the original criterion by neglecting the higher order term.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DISTLM were carried out as described in (Yap et al 2015) Briefly, the parameters showing the most consistent responses to the corresponding overall profiles (NMR, TRFLP or cytokines) was selected using stepwise selection under the second-order bias-corrected AIC (Yanagihara et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%