2015
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2015-60141-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order Born calculation of laser-assisted single ionization of helium by electrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we have concluded that it is rather the description of the laser interaction that is the cause of the presented discrepancy, likely in that of the slow emitted electron which is heavily influenced by the laser field. This is the current consensus held within recent works [84,85] which have employed more nuanced descriptions of the target dressing effects and field-free scattering than the original Höhr et al paper [82], although in the field-free case not to the extent offered by the CCC. Nonetheless, neither of these works are able to rectify the presented discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we have concluded that it is rather the description of the laser interaction that is the cause of the presented discrepancy, likely in that of the slow emitted electron which is heavily influenced by the laser field. This is the current consensus held within recent works [84,85] which have employed more nuanced descriptions of the target dressing effects and field-free scattering than the original Höhr et al paper [82], although in the field-free case not to the extent offered by the CCC. Nonetheless, neither of these works are able to rectify the presented discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, in the most comprehensive description available of the electron impact of helium [80] they also state that the most obvious limitation of their description is the first Born treatment of the collisional stage of the calculation. More recent attempts of examining this discrepancy include incorporating second order Born terms for the field-free scattering event [84] and target dressing effects [85], which although each find significant differences with the addition of these aspects, remain unsuccessful in rectifying the situation. Hence, the application of a more comprehensive collisional theory to this problem which treats the projectile-target interaction to all orders will provide useful insight into the cause of this discrepancy.…”
Section: Soft Photon Approximation Implementation With CCCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-perturbative treatment of laser-assisted (e, 2e) reactions, described above for the case of an atomic hydrogen target, has been extended by Joachain et al [29], Khalil et al [31], Makhoute et al [32,44,46], Bouzidi et al [81] and Ajana et al [43,45] to laser-assisted (e, 2e) reactions in helium, for which the possibilities of performing experiments are more favorable. These studies also showed that the choice of the laser parameters can strongly influence the dynamics of such processes, and that target-dressing effects can be important.…”
Section: The Semi-perturbative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the need for a more refined theory cannot be over emphasized, as was also pointed out by Hörr et al [20]. This motivated us to attempt many works that study the laser-assisted single ionization of hydrogen and helium atoms in the Ehrhardt asymmetric geometry using a second-order Born calculation [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Our group have also studied the symmetric case by restricting to a first Born treatment [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The absence of any experimental data adds furtherimportance to the theoretical study of such a process. In this paper, we want to extend our previous studies [19][20][21][22][23] on laser-assisted electronimpact single ionization processes in the the Ehrhardt asymmetric coplanar geometry to the case of the symmetric energy sharing kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%