2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-011-9661-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order differentiability of generalized perturbation maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we modify main results concerning the sum rule of second-order contingent derivatives for set-valued maps and its application to the sensitivity analysis of generalized perturbation maps. The obtained results are new and better than those in [1]. Some examples are proposed to illustrate our results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we modify main results concerning the sum rule of second-order contingent derivatives for set-valued maps and its application to the sensitivity analysis of generalized perturbation maps. The obtained results are new and better than those in [1]. Some examples are proposed to illustrate our results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…
In the paper, we give some remarks on [1]. Then, we modify main results concerning the sum rule of second-order contingent derivatives for set-valued maps and its application to the sensitivity analysis of generalized perturbation maps.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One speaks here about conditions concerning several types of generalized compactness for the graphs of underlying set-valued maps and such requirements are known to be quite strong in infinite dimensional spaces. Notice as well that the second-order conditions used in [11] are also of the same nature. It is true that there is a difference between the conditions used in [13] (working on finite dimensional vector spaces for first order objects) and [11] (working on general Banach spaces for second order objects) as the authors of the later paper emphasize, but, however, the techniques and the arguments are not so different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Notice as well that the second-order conditions used in [11] are also of the same nature. It is true that there is a difference between the conditions used in [13] (working on finite dimensional vector spaces for first order objects) and [11] (working on general Banach spaces for second order objects) as the authors of the later paper emphasize, but, however, the techniques and the arguments are not so different. Another remark is that in all these papers the approach inherits the main line of arguments and techniques from [10,Chapter 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation