1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.47.2982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order power corrections in the heavy-quark effective theory. II. Baryon form factors

Abstract: The analysis of 1/m 2 Q corrections of the previous paper is extended to the semileptonic decays of heavy baryons. We focus on the simplest case, the ground state Λ Q baryons, in which the light degrees of freedom are in a state of zero total angular momentum. The formalism, while identical in spirit, is considerably less cumbersome than for heavy mesons. The general results are applied to the semileptonic decay Λ b → Λ c ℓ ν. An estimate of the leading power corrections to the decay rate at zero recoil, which… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
165
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normalization of the form factor g(ω = 1) has been estimated to be g(1) = 0.96 [17], g(1) = 0.89 [18], and g(1) = 0.93 [19]. We have included a QCD correction of 0.985, so to good approximation, this simply rescales the values of |V cb | in Table 1 by 0.985 g (1) .…”
Section: Reliability Of the Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalization of the form factor g(ω = 1) has been estimated to be g(1) = 0.96 [17], g(1) = 0.89 [18], and g(1) = 0.93 [19]. We have included a QCD correction of 0.985, so to good approximation, this simply rescales the values of |V cb | in Table 1 by 0.985 g (1) .…”
Section: Reliability Of the Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this aspect the derivation I present here goes beyond the more conventional analysis of Ref. [43,42]. The reader is nevertheless advised to consult the latter works to get a broader perspective of the heavy quark theory -the more approaches you master the better for you.…”
Section: Deviations Of the B → D * Form Factor From Unity At Zero Recoilmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An estimate of the spin-dependent parameter has been given in [16] with the result ǫ b = − K b [17] which puts the estimate of [16] at the upper bound of the constraint. We use the value of [16] keeping in mind that the numerical value of ǫ b could be reduced in more realistic calculations.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%