1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01133742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second phase volume fraction and rubber particle size determinations in rubber-toughened polymers: A simple stereological approach and its application to the case of high impact polystyrene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2) and in the TEM micrographs (Figs. 3 and 4) revealing the salami cell structure of the particles 22. These figures confirm the heterogeneous distribution of RPS, which had been observed with LALLS when comparing D 10 , RPS < 1 μm, and RPS < 2 μm values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 and 2) and in the TEM micrographs (Figs. 3 and 4) revealing the salami cell structure of the particles 22. These figures confirm the heterogeneous distribution of RPS, which had been observed with LALLS when comparing D 10 , RPS < 1 μm, and RPS < 2 μm values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, LALLS was the analytical technique chosen in this study because it is widely applied to determine RPS in HIPS. Only by applying complex stereological methods to TEM micrographs, RPS could be precisely determined 21, 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For optimal impact resistance properties, the rubber particles must be themselves heterogeneous, exhibiting typical "salami" structures, with vitreous microinclusions dispersed in the rubber. The influence of particle morphology on HIPS mechanical properties has been reported by Cigna et al (1976), Aggarwal and Livigni (1977), Craig et al (1977), Turley and Keskkula (1980), Hall et al (1982), Mui et al (1982), Hall (1988), Maestrini et al (1992), Oliva et al (1993), Oliva (1993), Anzaldi et al (19941, Hazer andKurt (1999, andKatime et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…uma superfície matemática (espessura, t→0), a partir da seguinte relação matemática: onde φ = Fração volumétrica real das partículas na matriz; Φ A = fração aparente de partículas ou observada na micrografia; e R = Raio médio real das partículas e t = espessura do filme. Figura A equação mencionada tem sido utilizada na análise de imagens de filmes de espessura finita observados por microscopia eletrônica de transmissão e micrografias obtidas por MEV com aproximação para espessura t=0 (superfícies criofraturadas), considerando-se que as distribuições de tamanho de partículas como distribuições monomodais [9][10][11] . Observando-se os tamanhos médios e os respectivos desvios padrões dos HIPS apresentados na Tabela 2, esta aproximação pode ser considerada bastante razoável.…”
Section: Fração Volumétrica De Partículas De Borracha (Fvpb) Dos Hipsunclassified