2021
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s318737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Primary Cancers After Liver, Gallbladder and Bile Duct Cancers, and These Cancers as Second Primary Cancers

Abstract: Background Second primary cancers (SPCs) are important clinically as they may negatively influence patient survival and they may tell about therapeutic side effects and general causes of cancer. Population-based literature concerning SPCs after hepatobiliary cancers is limited and here we assess risks of SPCs after hepatocellular cancer (HCC), and cancers of the gallbladder, bile ducts and ampulla of Vater. In reverse order, we consider the risk of hepatobiliary cancers as SPCs after any cancer. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 . In contrast, there was a decreased risk of second primary gall bladder cancer (pooled SIR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.60–0.94; p = 0.01) from three studies [ 21 , 33 , 38 ]; Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 . In contrast, there was a decreased risk of second primary gall bladder cancer (pooled SIR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.60–0.94; p = 0.01) from three studies [ 21 , 33 , 38 ]; Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… . Stomach: 751 Pancreas: 137 Ovary: 34 1.37 (1.28–1.47) 1.21 (1.02–1.43) 1.83 (1.27–2.56) 7 Ye et al [ 35 ] Retrospective cohort study Australia; Tasmanian Cancer Registry Men and women with a diagnosis of cancer > 2 months; aged > 15 years 1980–2009; 6.9 years (mean) 51,802 28,242 (54.5%) 23,560 (45.5%) 66.2 (median) Lung: 121 Skin: 80 Prostate: 182 1.13 (0.80–1.58) 1.88 (1.38–2.55) 1.15 (0.90–1.48) 8 Zheng et al [ 37 ] Retrospective cohort study Sweden; Swedish Cancer Registry Men and women with a diagnosis of bladder or upper urinary tract cancer 1990–2015; average follow-up unknown 49,584 36,614 (74%) 12,970 (26.0%) 73 (median) Urinary bladder: 521 Kidney: 22 1.11 (1.02 –1.21) 1.32 (0.83–1.54) 8 Zheng et al [ 38 ] Retrospective cohort study Sweden; Swedish Cancer Registry Men and women with a diagnosis of hepatobiliary cancer 1990–2015; 36 months (median) 19,995 10,102 (64.9%) 9893 (49.5%) 72 (median) Gallbladder: 44 Bile duct: 61 0.85 (0.61–1.14) 1.20 (0.92–1.54) 8 *Newcastle–Ottawa Scale ratings ≥ 6 were considered high quality …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Age groups 0 to 89 were considered, and for age-standardization the International Cancer Survival Standard was used. 20 NORDCAN did not include survival data for persons aged over 89 years, probably because of low case numbers and deficits of cancer notifications. 22 The country-specific life tables were used to calculate the expected survival.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database combines GBC with cancer of the extrahepatic bile ducts, which has been almost equally common as GBC for men but about 1/3 of female GBC. We call these cancers jointly “GBC” to mark the largest constituent 20 . Much of the global Thorotrast cancer epidemiological data was generated in the Nordic countries, with the exception of NO from where no studies have been published, suggesting that Thorotrast was not used 14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%