2012
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.12.6087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Primary Malignant Neoplasms: A Clinicopathological Analysis from a Cancer Centre in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16] This study was in line with respect to the distribution of synchronous vs. metachronous malignancies as reported in the literature. [16][17][18] The available retrospective studies from various regions of India suggest higher percentage of metachronous malignancies compared to synchronous malignancy. 18,19 The distribution of synchronous and metachronous malignancies across various retrospective analyses is presented in (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13][14][15][16] This study was in line with respect to the distribution of synchronous vs. metachronous malignancies as reported in the literature. [16][17][18] The available retrospective studies from various regions of India suggest higher percentage of metachronous malignancies compared to synchronous malignancy. 18,19 The distribution of synchronous and metachronous malignancies across various retrospective analyses is presented in (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 According to existing literature the median/mean age of primary malignancy diagnosis in this study was comparable to the age reported across various studies (>50 years). 17,18 The potential occurrence of multiple primary malignancies should always be considered during diagnostic evaluation. While screening procedures will help detect any early-stage tumors, regular follow-up strategies will help in reducing the mortality burden from second primary malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the incidence of double primary malignancy is not considered rare [1] [2]; the risk of second cancer has been 10% at 20 years and 26% at 30 years following Hodgkin disease treatment [3], and 3.8%. At 10 years versus 7% at 15 years for patients treated with doxorubicin-based regimens for breast cancer [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of second malignancy in a patient with a known malignant tumour is not very uncommon [1]. Based on the time gap between the detection of two malignancies, these are labelled as synchronous or metachronous [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%