2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (sAML): Similarly Dismal Outcomes of AML After an Antecedent Hematologic Disorder and Therapy Related AML

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant difference between sAML-AHD and t-AML in terms of gender, CR achievement, refractory rates, relapse rates and early death. [11] These findings aligned with data from a Danish national population-based cohort study, which showed that "sAML" patients were older, had lower CR rates, and poorer survival compared to patients with de novo AML. Additionally, patients with sAML-AHD were more likely to have intermediate cytogenetics than patients with t-AML.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There were no significant difference between sAML-AHD and t-AML in terms of gender, CR achievement, refractory rates, relapse rates and early death. [11] These findings aligned with data from a Danish national population-based cohort study, which showed that "sAML" patients were older, had lower CR rates, and poorer survival compared to patients with de novo AML. Additionally, patients with sAML-AHD were more likely to have intermediate cytogenetics than patients with t-AML.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The designation of ontogeny as either MR-Hx/MR-CG or t-AML has clinical implications. Many studies have shown that "secondary" AML, mostly MR-Hx/MR-CG and t-AML, is associated with an inferior outcome with or without allo-HSCT 16,33,34,[36][37][38][39][40] . Our study has confirmed these findings by showing MR-Hx, MR-CG and t-AML all confer worse outcomes than de novo AML even after adjusting for age, treatment, transplant, and ELN risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiles were available for a consecutive subset of 15 younger AML patients (below 60 years of age), and we compared two contrasting patient groups with an antiproliferative effect corresponding to a relative response (i.e., the proliferation in the presence of bafilomycin A 10 nM being) <0.30 versus >0.60, respectively. These comparisons therefore included eight strong responders (Tables S1 and S2; patients 5,15,55,59,64,69,71) and seven weak responders (Table S1, patients 2, 23,31,34,36,41,51,73).…”
Section: Aml Cell Proliferation: Possible Protein Biomarkers For Susc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary AML includes patients with antecedent myeloid malignancies or previous exposure to cytotoxic treatment, and clinical studies have shown that these patients have reduced AML-free survival after intensive therapy [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] due to chemoresistance and increased relapse risk [2,60]. The strong responders showed a significantly increased frequency of patients with secondary/relapsed AML (17 out of 37 patients, see Table S2) compared with the intermediate/weak responders (6 out of 33 patients; Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0211).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%