Secondary cancer risk after radiation therapy for breast cancer with different radiotherapy techniques

Abstract

the aim of this study was to estimate the radiation-related secondary cancer risks in organs during the treatment of breast cancer with different radiotherapy techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The treatment plans for 26 patients with breast cancer who received whole-breast irradiation at a dose of 50 Gy included tangential field 3D-CRT with hard-wedges (W-TF), tangential field IMRT (2F-IMRT), multiple field IMRT (6F-IMRT), and double partial arcs (VMAT). Patients were divided into three groups according to the distance between the contralateral breast (CB) and the body of the sternum. Setup error was simulated by moving the isocenter, and the dose distribution was then recalculated without changing the field fluency distribution. Based on the linear-exponential, the plateau, and the full mechanistic dose-response models, the organ equivalent dose and excess absolute risk were calculated from dose-volume histograms to estimate the secondary cancer risks in organs. Compared with 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT showed excellent results regarding tumor conformity and homogeneity; however, the low dose volume to organs was considerably higher in 6F-IMRT and VMAT. Secondary cancer risks for 2F-IMRT were comparable or slightly lower than for W-TF, but considerably lower than for 6F-IMRT or VMAT. After setup error simulation, there was a small increase in secondary cancer risk for 2F-IMRT and an increase of 159% and 318% for 6F-IMRT and VMAT, respectively, compared with W-TF. Although these results were obtained in most patients, they did not necessarily apply to every individual. The secondary cancer risks in the CB decreased significantly in correlation with increased distance for all alternative techniques, although they were higher in VMAT and lower in 2F-IMRT regardless of the distance. After setup error simulation, the increased changes in secondary cancer risks in the CB were comparable between 2F-IMRT, 6F-IMRT, and VMAT, suggesting that the secondary cancer risks in the CB mainly depend on radiotherapy techniques and distance, although the effect of setup error cannot be ignored. In the contralateral lung (CL), the secondary cancer risks were almost independent from distance and depended mainly on radiotherapy techniques; they were rarely affected by setup error. VMAT was associated with a higher secondary cancer risk in the CL. For the ipsilateral lung (IL), the secondary cancer risks were higher than those in other organs because the IL receives high doses to achieve tumor control, and they were relatively lower in VMAT. This warrants special consideration when estimating the secondary cancer risk to the IL. The study results suggested that the optimal radiotherapy method for breast cancer should be determined on an individual basis and according to the balance between secondary cancer risks related to anatomic diversity and setup error, which can prevent blind selection of techniques.Breast cancer i...

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost With Volumetric Modulated Arc Technique in Patients With Breast Cancer: a Phase 2 Study.

“…This reduction in V5 is associated with reduction in secondary cancer [35,36] Since, ipsilateral MLD, contralateral lung V5 and breast mean doses in our study are comparable to those observed by Zhang et al, we may expect similar risk of second cancers in our patients. However, this risk may vary with distance of the organ from the sternum, patient anatomy, dose optimization, set up errors, organ motion [37] and smoking [22]. In our past series we have reported second cancers in the contralateral breast, oesophagus and lung cancers in 3.3%, 0.22% and 0.05% patients, respectively [25].…”

Proton pencil beam scanning reduces secondary cancer risk in breast cancer patients with internal mammary chain involvement compared to photon radiotherapy

“…The opportunities offered by VMAT in the treatment of BC are now established, with several studies demonstrated that VMAT is the optimal photon technique in terms of target coverage, especially when IMNs are included [6,20,32]. In a study dedicated to SCR evaluation with different photon techniques in the presence of setup uncertainties, Zhang et al [36] show that the improved target coverage of VMAT comes a the price of an increased SCR. At the same time, VMAT is also associated to lower heart doses compared to tangential 3D-CRT, especially when combining with DIBH [6].…”

Auxiliary Structures-Assisted Radiotherapy Improvement for Advanced Left Breast Cancer

“…The dose and volume of irradiated tissue are regarded as one of the key factors that strongly affect secondary cancer risk (8). Cancer risk after breast radiation therapy has been well estimated (9)(10)(11).…”