2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04920-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary consequences of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children and adolescents with knee involvement: physical activity, adiposity, fitness, and functional performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the heterogeneity of patient‐specific disease characteristics, differential responses to clinical management, and differences in assessment techniques may contribute to disparate research findings. While Houghton et al (9) reported impaired postural balance in youth with JIA using an unstable multi‐axis platform, Nesbitt et al (8) did not observe dynamic balance deficits using a triple single‐leg hop, while Merker et al (18) reported improved balance for youth with JIA using a uni‐axis balance platform. Such differences in research findings illustrate the challenges of assessing body structure and function outcomes and highlight the need for additional research to assess the secondary consequences of JIA in youth using validated and reliable protocols and measurement approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the heterogeneity of patient‐specific disease characteristics, differential responses to clinical management, and differences in assessment techniques may contribute to disparate research findings. While Houghton et al (9) reported impaired postural balance in youth with JIA using an unstable multi‐axis platform, Nesbitt et al (8) did not observe dynamic balance deficits using a triple single‐leg hop, while Merker et al (18) reported improved balance for youth with JIA using a uni‐axis balance platform. Such differences in research findings illustrate the challenges of assessing body structure and function outcomes and highlight the need for additional research to assess the secondary consequences of JIA in youth using validated and reliable protocols and measurement approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important considerations regarding physical activity participation include secondary consequences of JIA, which may include body structure and function (6), physical activity, and participation outcomes. A growing body of evidence indicates that youth with JIA may experience reduced physical activity (7,8), impaired postural balance (9), alterations in joint biomechanics of gait and jumping (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), decreased physical fitness (15), including bone and muscle structure (16), and strength deficits (17). However, the heterogeneity of patient-specific disease characteristics, differential responses to clinical management, and differences in assessment techniques may contribute to disparate research findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of evidence indicates that the secondary consequences of JIA may include participation in less moderate to vigorous physical activity (8,9), impaired postural balance (10), and decreased physical fitness (11), as well as bone and mus cle structure (12) and strength deficits (13). Further, individuals with JIA appear to be more sensitive to mechanical and thermal stimuli, even in the absence of pain or active disease (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Brussel et al observed that children with JIA had reduced anaerobic capacity [9]. A recent Canadian study in 2022 showed no statistically signi cant decrease in maximal oxygen uptake in a group of adolescents with JIA compared to same-aged controls [14]. Neither a larger Norwegian study in 2019 found a difference in CRF, assessed by a treadmill exercise test, between JIA patients and healthy children [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a meta-analysis before the era of biologic drugs, maximal oxygen uptake, a measure of cardiorespiratory tness (CRF), was 22% lower in JIA patients than in healthy children [10]. Also, other studies have reported lowered cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular tness in children with JIA despite adequate treatment [11][12][13][14]. Van Brussel et al observed that children with JIA had reduced anaerobic capacity [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%