2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40687-021-00273-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary cup and cap products in coarse geometry

Abstract: We construct secondary cup and cap products on coarse (co-)homology theories from given cross and slant products. They are defined for coarse spaces relative to weak generalized controlled deformation retracts. On ordinary coarse cohomology, our secondary cup product agrees with a secondary product defined by Roe. For coarsifications of topological coarse (co-)homology theories, our secondary cup and cap products correspond to the primary cup and cap products on Higson dominated coronas via transgression maps.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The claim is then equivalent to the fact that the two ways of performing the double suspension E Γ * +1 Σ 2 A ∼ = E Γ * (ΣA) ∼ = E Γ * −1 (A) (suspending the first copy of (0, 1) first and then the second copy versus the other way around) coincide up to the sign −1, where the sign arises from the reflection of the square (0, 1) 2 along the diagonal. How the proof works can be seen in the follow-up article [45,Lemma 4.6.3], where a more complicated analogous statement is shown for suspension in coarse (co-)homology. ■…”
Section: Reduced (Co-)homology and Reduced Transgressionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The claim is then equivalent to the fact that the two ways of performing the double suspension E Γ * +1 Σ 2 A ∼ = E Γ * (ΣA) ∼ = E Γ * −1 (A) (suspending the first copy of (0, 1) first and then the second copy versus the other way around) coincide up to the sign −1, where the sign arises from the reflection of the square (0, 1) 2 along the diagonal. How the proof works can be seen in the follow-up article [45,Lemma 4.6.3], where a more complicated analogous statement is shown for suspension in coarse (co-)homology. ■…”
Section: Reduced (Co-)homology and Reduced Transgressionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our primary motivation for expanding further on the theory -and also for our specific choice of contents -was to lay the foundations for the author's subsequent publication [45] about secondary cup and cap products on coarse (co-)homology theories, which was written completely in the framework presented here, albeit without equivariance. For this reason, we focus mainly on the material relevant therein instead of attempting to give a complete encyclopedic account on all the aspects of coarse (co-)homology which have been discussed in the literature so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%